1,604 research outputs found

    Quantum Query Algorithms are Completely Bounded Forms

    Get PDF
    We prove a characterization of tt-query quantum algorithms in terms of the unit ball of a space of degree-2t2t polynomials. Based on this, we obtain a refined notion of approximate polynomial degree that equals the quantum query complexity, answering a question of Aaronson et al. (CCC'16). Our proof is based on a fundamental result of Christensen and Sinclair (J. Funct. Anal., 1987) that generalizes the well-known Stinespring representation for quantum channels to multilinear forms. Using our characterization, we show that many polynomials of degree four are far from those coming from two-query quantum algorithms. We also give a simple and short proof of one of the results of Aaronson et al. showing an equivalence between one-query quantum algorithms and bounded quadratic polynomials.Comment: 24 pages, 3 figures. v2: 27 pages, minor changes in response to referee comment

    Low rank matrix recovery from rank one measurements

    Full text link
    We study the recovery of Hermitian low rank matrices X∈CnΓ—nX \in \mathbb{C}^{n \times n} from undersampled measurements via nuclear norm minimization. We consider the particular scenario where the measurements are Frobenius inner products with random rank-one matrices of the form ajajβˆ—a_j a_j^* for some measurement vectors a1,...,ama_1,...,a_m, i.e., the measurements are given by yj=tr(Xajajβˆ—)y_j = \mathrm{tr}(X a_j a_j^*). The case where the matrix X=xxβˆ—X=x x^* to be recovered is of rank one reduces to the problem of phaseless estimation (from measurements, yj=∣⟨x,aj⟩∣2y_j = |\langle x,a_j\rangle|^2 via the PhaseLift approach, which has been introduced recently. We derive bounds for the number mm of measurements that guarantee successful uniform recovery of Hermitian rank rr matrices, either for the vectors aja_j, j=1,...,mj=1,...,m, being chosen independently at random according to a standard Gaussian distribution, or aja_j being sampled independently from an (approximate) complex projective tt-design with t=4t=4. In the Gaussian case, we require mβ‰₯Crnm \geq C r n measurements, while in the case of 44-designs we need mβ‰₯Crnlog⁑(n)m \geq Cr n \log(n). Our results are uniform in the sense that one random choice of the measurement vectors aja_j guarantees recovery of all rank rr-matrices simultaneously with high probability. Moreover, we prove robustness of recovery under perturbation of the measurements by noise. The result for approximate 44-designs generalizes and improves a recent bound on phase retrieval due to Gross, Kueng and Krahmer. In addition, it has applications in quantum state tomography. Our proofs employ the so-called bowling scheme which is based on recent ideas by Mendelson and Koltchinskii.Comment: 24 page
    • …
    corecore