18,419 research outputs found

    Multi-graph learning

    Full text link
    University of Technology Sydney. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology.Multi-instance learning (MIL) is a special learning task where labels are only available for a bag of instances. Although MIL has been used for many applications, existing MIL algorithms cannot handle complex data objects, and all require that instances inside each bag are represented as feature vectors (e.g. being represented in an instance-feature format). In reality, many real-world objects are inherently complicated, and an object can be represented as multiple instances with dependency structures (i.e. graphs). Such dependency allows relationships between objects to play important roles, which, unfortunately, remain unaddressed in traditional instance-feature representations. Motivated by the challenges, this thesis formulates a new multi-graph learning paradigm for representing and classifying complicated objects. With the proposed multi-graph representation, the thesis systematically addresses several key learning tasks, including Multi-Graph Learning: A graph bag contains one or multiple graphs, and each bag is labeled as either positive or negative. The aim of multi-graph learning is to build a learning model from a number of labeled training bags to predict previously unseen bags with maximum accuracy. To solve the problem, we propose two types of approaches: 1) Multi-Graph Feature based Learning (gMGFL) algorithm that explores and selects an optimal set of subgraphs as features to transfer each bag into a single instance for further learning; and 2) Boosting based Multi-Graph Classification framework (bMGC), which employs dynamic weight adjustment, at both graph- and bag-levels, to select one subgraph in each iteration to form a set of weak graph classifiers. Multi-Instance Multi-Graph learning: A bag contains a number of instances and graphs in pairs, and the learning objective is to derive classification models from labeled bags, containing both instances and graphs, to predict previously unseen bags with maximum accuracy. In the thesis, we propose a Dual Embedding Multi-Instance Multi-Graph Learning (DE-MIMG) algorithm, which employs a dual embedding learning approach to (1) embed instance distributions into the informative subgraphs discovery process, and (2) embed discovered subgraphs into the instance feature selection process. Positive and Unlabeled Multi-Graph Learning: The training set only contains positive and unlabeled bags, where labels are only available for bags but not for individual graphs inside the bag. This problem setting raises significant challenges because bag-of-graph setting does not have features available to directly represent graph data, and no negative bags exits for deriving discriminative classification models. To solve the challenge, we propose a puMGL learning framework which relies on two iteratively combined processes: (1) deriving features to represent graphs for learning; and (2) deriving discriminative models with only positive and unlabeled graph bags. Multi-Graph-View Learning: A multi-graph-view model utilizes graphs constructed from multiple graph-views to represent an object. In our research, we formulate a new multi-graph-view learning task for graph classification, where each object to be classified is represented graphs under multi-graph-view. To solve the problem, we propose a Cross Graph-View Subgraph Feature based Learning (gCGVFL) algorithm that explores an optimal set of subgraph features cross multiple graph-views. In addition, a bag based multi-graph model is further used to relax the labeling by only requiring one label for each graph bag, which corresponds to one object. For learning classification models, we propose a multi-graph-view bag learning algorithm (MGVBL), to explore subgraphs from multiple graph-views for learning. Experiments on real-world data validate and demonstrate the performance of proposed methods for classifying complicated objects using multi-graph learning

    One-Class Classification: Taxonomy of Study and Review of Techniques

    Full text link
    One-class classification (OCC) algorithms aim to build classification models when the negative class is either absent, poorly sampled or not well defined. This unique situation constrains the learning of efficient classifiers by defining class boundary just with the knowledge of positive class. The OCC problem has been considered and applied under many research themes, such as outlier/novelty detection and concept learning. In this paper we present a unified view of the general problem of OCC by presenting a taxonomy of study for OCC problems, which is based on the availability of training data, algorithms used and the application domains applied. We further delve into each of the categories of the proposed taxonomy and present a comprehensive literature review of the OCC algorithms, techniques and methodologies with a focus on their significance, limitations and applications. We conclude our paper by discussing some open research problems in the field of OCC and present our vision for future research.Comment: 24 pages + 11 pages of references, 8 figure

    PAC-Bayes Analysis of Multi-view Learning

    Get PDF
    This paper presents eight PAC-Bayes bounds to analyze the generalization performance of multi-view classifiers. These bounds adopt data dependent Gaussian priors which emphasize classifiers with high view agreements. The center of the prior for the first two bounds is the origin, while the center of the prior for the third and fourth bounds is given by a data dependent vector. An important technique to obtain these bounds is two derived logarithmic determinant inequalities whose difference lies in whether the dimensionality of data is involved. The centers of the fifth and sixth bounds are calculated on a separate subset of the training set. The last two bounds use unlabeled data to represent view agreements and are thus applicable to semi-supervised multi-view learning. We evaluate all the presented multi-view PAC-Bayes bounds on benchmark data and compare them with previous single-view PAC-Bayes bounds. The usefulness and performance of the multi-view bounds are discussed.Comment: 35 page
    • …
    corecore