57,030 research outputs found
A Survey of Multi-task Learning in Natural Language Processing: Regarding Task Relatedness and Training Methods
Multi-task learning (MTL) has become increasingly popular in natural language
processing (NLP) because it improves the performance of related tasks by
exploiting their commonalities and differences. Nevertheless, it is still not
understood very well how multi-task learning can be implemented based on the
relatedness of training tasks. In this survey, we review recent advances of
multi-task learning methods in NLP, with the aim of summarizing them into two
general multi-task training methods based on their task relatedness: (i) joint
training and (ii) multi-step training. We present examples in various NLP
downstream applications, summarize the task relationships and discuss future
directions of this promising topic.Comment: Accepted to EACL 2023 as regular long pape
A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4
Large language models (LLMs) are a special class of pretrained language
models obtained by scaling model size, pretraining corpus and computation.
LLMs, because of their large size and pretraining on large volumes of text
data, exhibit special abilities which allow them to achieve remarkable
performances without any task-specific training in many of the natural language
processing tasks. The era of LLMs started with OpenAI GPT-3 model, and the
popularity of LLMs is increasing exponentially after the introduction of models
like ChatGPT and GPT4. We refer to GPT-3 and its successor OpenAI models,
including ChatGPT and GPT4, as GPT-3 family large language models (GLLMs). With
the ever-rising popularity of GLLMs, especially in the research community,
there is a strong need for a comprehensive survey which summarizes the recent
research progress in multiple dimensions and can guide the research community
with insightful future research directions. We start the survey paper with
foundation concepts like transformers, transfer learning, self-supervised
learning, pretrained language models and large language models. We then present
a brief overview of GLLMs and discuss the performances of GLLMs in various
downstream tasks, specific domains and multiple languages. We also discuss the
data labelling and data augmentation abilities of GLLMs, the robustness of
GLLMs, the effectiveness of GLLMs as evaluators, and finally, conclude with
multiple insightful future research directions. To summarize, this
comprehensive survey paper will serve as a good resource for both academic and
industry people to stay updated with the latest research related to GPT-3
family large language models.Comment: Preprint under review, 58 page
Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum
The field of specialization known as the science of learning is not, in fact, one field. Science of learning is a term that serves as an umbrella for many lines of research, theory, and application. A term with an even wider reach is Learning Sciences (Sawyer, 2006). The present book represents a sliver, albeit a substantial one, of the scholarship on the science of learning and its application in educational settings (Science of Instruction, Mayer 2011). Although much, but not all, of what is presented in this book is focused on learning in college and university settings, teachers of all academic levels may find the recommendations made by chapter authors of service. The overarching theme of this book is on the interplay between the science of learning, the science of instruction, and the science of assessment (Mayer, 2011). The science of learning is a systematic and empirical approach to understanding how people learn. More formally, Mayer (2011) defined the science of learning as the “scientific study of how people learn” (p. 3). The science of instruction (Mayer 2011), informed in part by the science of learning, is also on display throughout the book. Mayer defined the science of instruction as the “scientific study of how to help people learn” (p. 3). Finally, the assessment of student learning (e.g., learning, remembering, transferring knowledge) during and after instruction helps us determine the effectiveness of our instructional methods. Mayer defined the science of assessment as the “scientific study of how to determine what people know” (p.3). Most of the research and applications presented in this book are completed within a science of learning framework. Researchers first conducted research to understand how people learn in certain controlled contexts (i.e., in the laboratory) and then they, or others, began to consider how these understandings could be applied in educational settings. Work on the cognitive load theory of learning, which is discussed in depth in several chapters of this book (e.g., Chew; Lee and Kalyuga; Mayer; Renkl), provides an excellent example that documents how science of learning has led to valuable work on the science of instruction. Most of the work described in this book is based on theory and research in cognitive psychology. We might have selected other topics (and, thus, other authors) that have their research base in behavior analysis, computational modeling and computer science, neuroscience, etc. We made the selections we did because the work of our authors ties together nicely and seemed to us to have direct applicability in academic settings
Choosing how to choose : Institutional pressures affecting the adoption of personnel selection procedures
The gap between science and practice in personnel selection is an ongoing concern of human resource management. This paper takes Oliver´s framework of organizations´ strategic responses to institutional pressures as a basis for outlining the diverse economic and social demands that facilitate or inhibit the application of scientifically recommended selection procedures. Faced with a complex network of multiple requirements, practitioners make more diverse choices in response to any of these pressures than has previously been acknowledged in the scientific literature. Implications for the science-practitioner gap are discussed
- …