27,833 research outputs found
A simple rule for axon outgrowth and synaptic competition generates realistic connection lengths and filling fractions
Neural connectivity at the cellular and mesoscopic level appears very
specific and is presumed to arise from highly specific developmental
mechanisms. However, there are general shared features of connectivity in
systems as different as the networks formed by individual neurons in
Caenorhabditis elegans or in rat visual cortex and the mesoscopic circuitry of
cortical areas in the mouse, macaque, and human brain. In all these systems,
connection length distributions have very similar shapes, with an initial large
peak and a long flat tail representing the admixture of long-distance
connections to mostly short-distance connections. Furthermore, not all
potentially possible synapses are formed, and only a fraction of axons (called
filling fraction) establish synapses with spatially neighboring neurons. We
explored what aspects of these connectivity patterns can be explained simply by
random axonal outgrowth. We found that random axonal growth away from the soma
can already reproduce the known distance distribution of connections. We also
observed that experimentally observed filling fractions can be generated by
competition for available space at the target neurons--a model markedly
different from previous explanations. These findings may serve as a baseline
model for the development of connectivity that can be further refined by more
specific mechanisms.Comment: 31 pages (incl. supplementary information); Cerebral Cortex Advance
Access published online on May 12, 200
Synchronized Oscillations During Cooperative Feature Linking in a Cortical Model of Visual Perception
A neural network model of synchronized oscillator activity in visual cortex is presented in order to account for recent neurophysiological findings that such synchronization may reflect global properties of the stimulus. In these recent experiments, it was reported that synchronization of oscillatory firing responses to moving bar stimuli occurred not only for nearby neurons, but also occurred between neurons separated by several cortical columns (several mm of cortex) when these neurons shared some receptive field preferences specific to the stimuli. These results were obtained not only for single bar stimuli but also across two disconnected, but colinear, bars moving in the same direction. Our model and computer simulations obtain these synchrony results across both single and double bar stimuli. For the double bar case, synchronous oscillations are induced in the region between the bars, but no oscillations are induced in the regions beyond the stimuli. These results were achieved with cellular units that exhibit limit cycle oscillations for a robust range of input values, but which approach an equilibrium state when undriven. Single and double bar synchronization of these oscillators was achieved by different, but formally related, models of preattentive visual boundary segmentation and attentive visual object recognition, as well as nearest-neighbor and randomly coupled models. In preattentive visual segmentation, synchronous oscillations may reflect the binding of local feature detectors into a globally coherent grouping. In object recognition, synchronous oscillations may occur during an attentive resonant state that triggers new learning. These modelling results support earlier theoretical predictions of synchronous visual cortical oscillations and demonstrate the robustness of the mechanisms capable of generating synchrony.Air Force Office of Scientific Research (90-0175); Army Research Office (DAAL-03-88-K0088); Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (90-0083); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NGT-50497
Neural Network Models of Learning and Memory: Leading Questions and an Emerging Framework
Office of Naval Research and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N00014-95-1-0409, N00014-1-95-0657); National Institutes of Health (NIH 20-316-4304-5
Brain architecture: A design for natural computation
Fifty years ago, John von Neumann compared the architecture of the brain with
that of computers that he invented and which is still in use today. In those
days, the organisation of computers was based on concepts of brain
organisation. Here, we give an update on current results on the global
organisation of neural systems. For neural systems, we outline how the spatial
and topological architecture of neuronal and cortical networks facilitates
robustness against failures, fast processing, and balanced network activation.
Finally, we discuss mechanisms of self-organization for such architectures.
After all, the organization of the brain might again inspire computer
architecture
Recommended from our members
The role of HG in the analysis of temporal iteration and interaural correlation
Can biological quantum networks solve NP-hard problems?
There is a widespread view that the human brain is so complex that it cannot
be efficiently simulated by universal Turing machines. During the last decades
the question has therefore been raised whether we need to consider quantum
effects to explain the imagined cognitive power of a conscious mind.
This paper presents a personal view of several fields of philosophy and
computational neurobiology in an attempt to suggest a realistic picture of how
the brain might work as a basis for perception, consciousness and cognition.
The purpose is to be able to identify and evaluate instances where quantum
effects might play a significant role in cognitive processes.
Not surprisingly, the conclusion is that quantum-enhanced cognition and
intelligence are very unlikely to be found in biological brains. Quantum
effects may certainly influence the functionality of various components and
signalling pathways at the molecular level in the brain network, like ion
ports, synapses, sensors, and enzymes. This might evidently influence the
functionality of some nodes and perhaps even the overall intelligence of the
brain network, but hardly give it any dramatically enhanced functionality. So,
the conclusion is that biological quantum networks can only approximately solve
small instances of NP-hard problems.
On the other hand, artificial intelligence and machine learning implemented
in complex dynamical systems based on genuine quantum networks can certainly be
expected to show enhanced performance and quantum advantage compared with
classical networks. Nevertheless, even quantum networks can only be expected to
efficiently solve NP-hard problems approximately. In the end it is a question
of precision - Nature is approximate.Comment: 38 page
Structural brain complexity and cognitive decline in late life : A longitudinal study in the Aberdeen 1936 Birth Cohort
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Peer reviewedPostprin
- …