Minimum Cost Consensus Models based on Random Opinions

In some complex group decision making cases, the opinions of decision makers (DMs) present random characteristic. However, it is difficult to determine the range of opinions by knowing only their probability distributions. In this paper, we construct cost consensus models with random opinions. The objective function is obtaining the minimum consensus budget under a certain confidence level. Nonetheless, the constraints restrict the upper limit of the consensus cost, the lower limit of DMs' compensations, and the opinions deviation between DMs and the moderator. As such, probabilistic planning based on a genetic algorithm is designed to resolve the minimum cost consensus models based on China's urban demolition negotiation, which can better simulate the consensus decision-making process and obtain a satisfactory solution for the random optimization consensus models. The proposed models generalize both Ben-Arieh's minimum cost consensus model and Gong's consensus model with uncertain opinions. Considering that the opinions of DMs and the moderator obey various distributions, the models simulate the opinion characteristics more effectively. In the case analysis, a sensitivity analysis method is adopted to obtain the minimum budget, and probabilistic planning based on genetic algorithm to obtain a satisfactory solution that is closer to reality

Impact of Decision Rules and Non-Cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version.In group decision making (GDM), it is sensible to achive minimum consensus cost (MCC) because the consensus reaching process (CRP) resources are often limited. In this endeavour, though, there are still two issues that require paying attention to: (1) the impact of decision rules, including decision weights and aggregation functions, on MCC; and (2) the impact of non-cooperative behaviors on MCC. Hence, this paper analytically reveals the decision rules to minimize MCC or maximize MCC. Furthermore, detailed simulation experiments show the joint impact of non-cooperative behavior and decisions rules on MCC, as well as revealing the effect of the consensus within the established MCC target

The Optimization Ordering Model for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations with Utility Functions

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Intuitionistic fuzzy sets describe information from the three aspects of membership degree, non-membership degree and hesitation degree, which has more practical significance when uncertainty pervades qualitative decision problems. In this paper, we investigate the problem of ranking intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) based on various non-linear utility functions. First, we transform IFPRs into their isomorphic interval-value fuzzy preference relations (IVFPRs), and utilise non-linear utility functions, such as parabolic, S-shaped, and hyperbolic absolute risk aversion, to fit the true value of a decision-maker's judgement. Ultimately, the optimization ordering models for the membership and non-membership of IVFPRs based on utility function are constructed, with objective function aiming at minimizing the distance deviation between the multiplicative consistency ideal judgment and the actual judgment, represented by utility function, subject to the decision-maker's utility constraints. The proposed models ensure that more factual and optimal ranking of alternative is acquired, avoiding information distortion caused by the operations of intervals. Second, by introducing a non-Archimedean infinitesimal, we establish the optimization ordering model for IFPRs with the priority of utility or deviation, which realises the goal of prioritising solutions under multi-objective programming. Subsequently, we verify that a close connection exists between the ranking for membership and non-membership degree IVFPRs. Comparison analyses with existing approaches are summarized to demonstrate that the proposed models have advantage in dealing with group decision making problems with IFPRs