23,074 research outputs found

    Minimal non-neighborhood-perfect graphs

    Full text link

    On bounding the difference between the maximum degree and the chromatic number by a constant

    Full text link
    We provide a finite forbidden induced subgraph characterization for the graph class Υk\varUpsilon_k, for all k∈N0k \in \mathbb{N}_0, which is defined as follows. A graph is in Υk\varUpsilon_k if for any induced subgraph, Δ≤χ−1+k\Delta \leq \chi -1 + k holds, where Δ\Delta is the maximum degree and χ\chi is the chromatic number of the subgraph. We compare these results with those given in [O. Schaudt, V. Weil, On bounding the difference between the maximum degree and the clique number, Graphs and Combinatorics 31(5), 1689-1702 (2015). DOI: 10.1007/s00373-014-1468-3], where we studied the graph class Ωk\varOmega_k, for k∈N0k \in \mathbb{N}_0, whose graphs are such that for any induced subgraph, Δ≤ω−1+k\Delta \leq \omega -1 + k holds, where ω\omega denotes the clique number of a graph. In particular, we give a characterization in terms of Ωk\varOmega_k and Υk\varUpsilon_k of those graphs where the neighborhood of every vertex is perfect.Comment: 10 pages, 4 figure

    Optimal accessing and non-accessing structures for graph protocols

    Full text link
    An accessing set in a graph is a subset B of vertices such that there exists D subset of B, such that each vertex of V\B has an even number of neighbors in D. In this paper, we introduce new bounds on the minimal size kappa'(G) of an accessing set, and on the maximal size kappa(G) of a non-accessing set of a graph G. We show strong connections with perfect codes and give explicitly kappa(G) and kappa'(G) for several families of graphs. Finally, we show that the corresponding decision problems are NP-Complete

    The leafage of a chordal graph

    Full text link
    The leafage l(G) of a chordal graph G is the minimum number of leaves of a tree in which G has an intersection representation by subtrees. We obtain upper and lower bounds on l(G) and compute it on special classes. The maximum of l(G) on n-vertex graphs is n - lg n - (1/2) lg lg n + O(1). The proper leafage l*(G) is the minimum number of leaves when no subtree may contain another; we obtain upper and lower bounds on l*(G). Leafage equals proper leafage on claw-free chordal graphs. We use asteroidal sets and structural properties of chordal graphs.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figure

    On Weak Odd Domination and Graph-based Quantum Secret Sharing

    Full text link
    A weak odd dominated (WOD) set in a graph is a subset B of vertices for which there exists a distinct set of vertices C such that every vertex in B has an odd number of neighbors in C. We point out the connections of weak odd domination with odd domination, [sigma,rho]-domination, and perfect codes. We introduce bounds on \kappa(G), the maximum size of WOD sets of a graph G, and on \kappa'(G), the minimum size of non WOD sets of G. Moreover, we prove that the corresponding decision problems are NP-complete. The study of weak odd domination is mainly motivated by the design of graph-based quantum secret sharing protocols: a graph G of order n corresponds to a secret sharing protocol which threshold is \kappa_Q(G) = max(\kappa(G), n-\kappa'(G)). These graph-based protocols are very promising in terms of physical implementation, however all such graph-based protocols studied in the literature have quasi-unanimity thresholds (i.e. \kappa_Q(G)=n-o(n) where n is the order of the graph G underlying the protocol). In this paper, we show using probabilistic methods, the existence of graphs with smaller \kappa_Q (i.e. \kappa_Q(G)< 0.811n where n is the order of G). We also prove that deciding for a given graph G whether \kappa_Q(G)< k is NP-complete, which means that one cannot efficiently double check that a graph randomly generated has actually a \kappa_Q smaller than 0.811n.Comment: Subsumes arXiv:1109.6181: Optimal accessing and non-accessing structures for graph protocol

    Rainbow domination and related problems on some classes of perfect graphs

    Full text link
    Let k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N} and let GG be a graph. A function f:V(G)→2[k]f: V(G) \rightarrow 2^{[k]} is a rainbow function if, for every vertex xx with f(x)=∅f(x)=\emptyset, f(N(x))=[k]f(N(x)) =[k]. The rainbow domination number γkr(G)\gamma_{kr}(G) is the minimum of ∑x∈V(G)∣f(x)∣\sum_{x \in V(G)} |f(x)| over all rainbow functions. We investigate the rainbow domination problem for some classes of perfect graphs
    • …
    corecore