337,164 research outputs found

    Surface free energy and microarray deposition technology

    Get PDF
    Microarray techniques use a combinatorial approach to assess complex biochemical interactions. The fundamental goal is simultaneous, large-scale experimentation analogous to the automation achieved in the semiconductor industry. However, microarray deposition inherently involves liquids contacting solid substrates. Liquid droplet shapes are determined by surface and interfacial tension forces, and flows during drying. This article looks at how surface free energy and wetting considerations may influence the accuracy and reliability of spotted microarray experiments

    MAPPI-DAT : data management and analysis for protein-protein interaction data from the high-throughput MAPPIT cell microarray platform

    Get PDF
    Protein-protein interaction (PPI) studies have dramatically expanded our knowledge about cellular behaviour and development in different conditions. A multitude of high-throughput PPI techniques have been developed to achieve proteome-scale coverage for PPI studies, including the microarray based Mammalian Protein-Protein Interaction Trap (MAPPIT) system. Because such high-throughput techniques typically report thousands of interactions, managing and analysing the large amounts of acquired data is a challenge. We have therefore built the MAPPIT cell microArray Protein Protein Interaction-Data management & Analysis Tool (MAPPI-DAT) as an automated data management and analysis tool for MAPPIT cell microarray experiments. MAPPI-DAT stores the experimental data and metadata in a systematic and structured way, automates data analysis and interpretation, and enables the meta-analysis of MAPPIT cell microarray data across all stored experiments

    Information visualization for DNA microarray data analysis: A critical review

    Get PDF
    Graphical representation may provide effective means of making sense of the complexity and sheer volume of data produced by DNA microarray experiments that monitor the expression patterns of thousands of genes simultaneously. The ability to use ldquoabstractrdquo graphical representation to draw attention to areas of interest, and more in-depth visualizations to answer focused questions, would enable biologists to move from a large amount of data to particular records they are interested in, and therefore, gain deeper insights in understanding the microarray experiment results. This paper starts by providing some background knowledge of microarray experiments, and then, explains how graphical representation can be applied in general to this problem domain, followed by exploring the role of visualization in gene expression data analysis. Having set the problem scene, the paper then examines various multivariate data visualization techniques that have been applied to microarray data analysis. These techniques are critically reviewed so that the strengths and weaknesses of each technique can be tabulated. Finally, several key problem areas as well as possible solutions to them are discussed as being a source for future work

    Diverse correlation structures in gene expression data and their utility in improving statistical inference

    Full text link
    It is well known that correlations in microarray data represent a serious nuisance deteriorating the performance of gene selection procedures. This paper is intended to demonstrate that the correlation structure of microarray data provides a rich source of useful information. We discuss distinct correlation substructures revealed in microarray gene expression data by an appropriate ordering of genes. These substructures include stochastic proportionality of expression signals in a large percentage of all gene pairs, negative correlations hidden in ordered gene triples, and a long sequence of weakly dependent random variables associated with ordered pairs of genes. The reported striking regularities are of general biological interest and they also have far-reaching implications for theory and practice of statistical methods of microarray data analysis. We illustrate the latter point with a method for testing differential expression of nonoverlapping gene pairs. While designed for testing a different null hypothesis, this method provides an order of magnitude more accurate control of type 1 error rate compared to conventional methods of individual gene expression profiling. In addition, this method is robust to the technical noise. Quantitative inference of the correlation structure has the potential to extend the analysis of microarray data far beyond currently practiced methods.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS120 the Annals of Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

    Nucleic acid - protein fingerprints. Novel protein classification based on nucleic acid - protein recognition

    Get PDF
    Protein chemistry uses protein description and classification based on molecular mass and isoelectric point as general features. Enzymes are also compared by enzymatic reaction constants, namely Km and kcat values. Proteins are also studied by binding to different oligonucleotides. Here we suggest a simple experimental method for such a comparison of DNA binding proteins, which we call "nucleic acid-protein fingerprints". The experimental design of the method is based on an use of short oligonucleotides immobilized inside microarray of hydrogel cells - biochip. As a first stage, we solved a simple experimental task: what is the shortest single strand oligonucleotide to be recognized by protein? We tested binding of oligonucleotides from 2 to 12 bases, and we have obtained unexpected result that tetranucleotide one is long enough for specific protein binding. This 4-mer can contain two universal bases - 5-nitroindole nucleoside analogue (Ni) and only two meaningful bases, like A, G, T and C. The result obtained opens a way for constructing the simplest protein binding microarray. This microarray consists of 16 meaningful dinucleotides, like AA, AG, CT, GG etc. Physical sequences of all the nucleotides were NiNiAA, etc, where Ni is bound to gel through the amino linker. We prepared such an array and tested it for specific binding of several DNA/RNA binding proteins, labeled with fluorescent dyes like Texas Red of Bodipy. We tested RNase A and Binase for binding on the simplest microarray. It contains only 16 units, and there is a significant difference in the binding patterns. The microarray based on 3-mers must contains 64 units and must have much more specificity. The new principle of protein classification based on nucleic acid-protein recognition has been proposed and experimentally proved. Such an experimental approach must lead to a universal classification of specific DNA/RNA binding proteins

    Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma

    Get PDF
    Microarray analysis reaches increasing popularity during the investigation of prognostic gene clusters in oncology. The standardisation of technical procedures will be essential to compare various datasets produced by different research groups. In several projects the amount of available tissue is limited. In such cases the preamplification of RNA might be necessary prior to microarray hybridisation. To evaluate the comparability of microarray results generated either by amplified or non amplified RNA we isolated RNA from colorectal cancer samples (stage UICC IV) following tumour tissue enrichment by macroscopic manual dissection (CMD). One part of the RNA was directly labelled and hybridised to GeneChips (HG-U133A, Affymetrix), the other part of the RNA was amplified according to the ?Eberwine? protocol and was then hybridised to the microarrays. During unsupervised hierarchical clustering the samples were divided in groups regarding the RNA pre-treatment and 5.726 differentially expressed genes were identified. Using independent microarray data of 31 amplified vs. 24 non amplified RNA samples from colon carcinomas (stage UICC III) in a set of 50 predictive genes we validated the amplification bias. In conclusion microarray data resulting from different pre-processing regarding RNA pre-amplification can not be compared within one analysis
    corecore