10,222 research outputs found
A Study of IEEE 802.15.4 Security Framework for Wireless Body Area Network
A Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) is a collection of low-power and
lightweight wireless sensor nodes that are used to monitor the human body
functions and the surrounding environment. It supports a number of innovative
and interesting applications, including ubiquitous healthcare and Consumer
Electronics (CE) applications. Since WBAN nodes are used to collect sensitive
(life-critical) information and may operate in hostile environments, they
require strict security mechanisms to prevent malicious interaction with the
system. In this paper, we first highlight major security requirements and
Denial of Service (DoS) attacks in WBAN at Physical, Medium Access Control
(MAC), Network, and Transport layers. Then we discuss the IEEE 802.15.4
security framework and identify the security vulnerabilities and major attacks
in the context of WBAN. Different types of attacks on the Contention Access
Period (CAP) and Contention Free Period (CFP) parts of the superframe are
analyzed and discussed. It is observed that a smart attacker can successfully
corrupt an increasing number of GTS slots in the CFP period and can
considerably affect the Quality of Service (QoS) in WBAN (since most of the
data is carried in CFP period). As we increase the number of smart attackers
the corrupted GTS slots are eventually increased, which prevents the legitimate
nodes to utilize the bandwidth efficiently. This means that the direct
adaptation of IEEE 802.15.4 security framework for WBAN is not totally secure
for certain WBAN applications. New solutions are required to integrate high
level security in WBAN.Comment: 14 pages, 7 figures, 2 table
Security and Privacy Issues in Wireless Mesh Networks: A Survey
This book chapter identifies various security threats in wireless mesh
network (WMN). Keeping in mind the critical requirement of security and user
privacy in WMNs, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of various
possible attacks on different layers of the communication protocol stack for
WMNs and their corresponding defense mechanisms. First, it identifies the
security vulnerabilities in the physical, link, network, transport, application
layers. Furthermore, various possible attacks on the key management protocols,
user authentication and access control protocols, and user privacy preservation
protocols are presented. After enumerating various possible attacks, the
chapter provides a detailed discussion on various existing security mechanisms
and protocols to defend against and wherever possible prevent the possible
attacks. Comparative analyses are also presented on the security schemes with
regards to the cryptographic schemes used, key management strategies deployed,
use of any trusted third party, computation and communication overhead involved
etc. The chapter then presents a brief discussion on various trust management
approaches for WMNs since trust and reputation-based schemes are increasingly
becoming popular for enforcing security in wireless networks. A number of open
problems in security and privacy issues for WMNs are subsequently discussed
before the chapter is finally concluded.Comment: 62 pages, 12 figures, 6 tables. This chapter is an extension of the
author's previous submission in arXiv submission: arXiv:1102.1226. There are
some text overlaps with the previous submissio
On Ladder Logic Bombs in Industrial Control Systems
In industrial control systems, devices such as Programmable Logic Controllers
(PLCs) are commonly used to directly interact with sensors and actuators, and
perform local automatic control. PLCs run software on two different layers: a)
firmware (i.e. the OS) and b) control logic (processing sensor readings to
determine control actions). In this work, we discuss ladder logic bombs, i.e.
malware written in ladder logic (or one of the other IEC 61131-3-compatible
languages). Such malware would be inserted by an attacker into existing control
logic on a PLC, and either persistently change the behavior, or wait for
specific trigger signals to activate malicious behaviour. For example, the LLB
could replace legitimate sensor readings with manipulated values. We see the
concept of LLBs as a generalization of attacks such as the Stuxnet attack. We
introduce LLBs on an abstract level, and then demonstrate several designs based
on real PLC devices in our lab. In particular, we also focus on stealthy LLBs,
i.e. LLBs that are hard to detect by human operators manually validating the
program running in PLCs. In addition to introducing vulnerabilities on the
logic layer, we also discuss countermeasures and we propose two detection
techniques.Comment: 11 pages, 14 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorith
- …