3 research outputs found

    Meanings and Applications of Structure in Networks of Dynamic Systems

    Full text link
    This chapter reviews four notions of system structure, three of which are contextual and classic (i.e. the complete computational structure linked to a state space model, the sparsity pattern of a transfer function, and the interconnection of subsystems) and one which is relatively new (i.e. the signal structure of a system's dynamical structure function). Although each of these structural concepts apply to the nonlinear and stochastic setting, this work will focus on linear time invariant systems to distill the key concepts and make their relationships clear. We then discusses three applications of the newest structural form (the signal structure of a system's dynamical structure function): network reconstruction, vulnerability analysis, and a recent result in distributed control that guarantees the synthesis of a stabilizing controller with a specified structure or proves that no such controller exists

    Optimal distributed control for platooning via sparse coprime factorizations

    Full text link
    We introduce a novel distributed control architecture for heterogeneous platoons of linear time--invariant autonomous vehicles. Our approach is based on a generalization of the concept of {\em leader--follower} controllers for which we provide a Youla--like parameterization while the sparsity constraints are imposed on the controller's left coprime factors, outlying a new concept of structural constraints in distributed control. The proposed scheme is amenable to optimal controller design via norm based costs, it guarantees string stability and eliminates the accordion effect from the behavior of the platoon. We also introduce a synchronization mechanism for the exact compensation of the time delays induced by the wireless broadcasting of information.Comment: 48 pages, 8 figures, Provisionally accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Contro

    Model Boundary Approximation Method as a Unifying Framework for Balanced Truncation and Singular Perturbation Approximation

    Full text link
    We show that two widely accepted model reduction techniques, Balanced Truncation and Balanced Singular Perturbation Approximation, can be derived as limiting approximations of a carefully constructed parameterization of Linear Time Invariant (LTI) systems by employing the Model Boundary Approximation Method (MBAM), a recent development in the Physics literature. This unifying framework of these popular model reduction techniques shows that Balanced Truncation and Balanced Singular Perturbation Approximation each correspond to a particular boundary point on a manifold, the "model manifold," which is associated with the specific choice of model parameterization and initial condition, and is embedded in a sample space of measured outputs, which can be chosen arbitrarily, provided that the number of samples exceeds the number of parameters. We also show that MBAM provides a novel way to interpolate between Balanced Truncation and Balanced Singular Perturbation Approximation, by exploring the set of approximations on the boundary of the manifold between the elements that correspond to the two model reduction techniques; this allows for alternative approximations of a given system to be found that may be better under certain conditions. The work herein suggests similar types of approximations may be obtainable in topologically similar places (i.e. on certain boundaries) on the model manifold of nonlinear systems if analogous parameterizations can be achieved, therefore extending these widely accepted model reduction techniques to nonlinear systems
    corecore