10 research outputs found

    A random version of Sperner's theorem

    Get PDF
    Let P(n)\mathcal{P}(n) denote the power set of [n][n], ordered by inclusion, and let P(n,p)\mathcal{P}(n,p) be obtained from P(n)\mathcal{P}(n) by selecting elements from P(n)\mathcal{P}(n) independently at random with probability pp. A classical result of Sperner asserts that every antichain in P(n)\mathcal{P}(n) has size at most that of the middle layer, (nn/2)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}. In this note we prove an analogous result for P(n,p)\mathcal{P} (n,p): If pnpn \rightarrow \infty then, with high probability, the size of the largest antichain in P(n,p)\mathcal{P}(n,p) is at most (1+o(1))p(nn/2)(1+o(1)) p \binom{n}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}. This solves a conjecture of Osthus who proved the result in the case when pn/lognpn/\log n \rightarrow \infty. Our condition on pp is best-possible. In fact, we prove a more general result giving an upper bound on the size of the largest antichain for a wider range of values of pp.Comment: 7 pages. Updated to include minor revisions and publication dat

    Improved bounds for cross-Sperner systems

    Get PDF
    A collection of families (F1,F2,⋯,Fk)∈P([n])k is cross-Sperner if there is no pair i≠j for which some Fi∈Fi is comparable to some Fj∈Fj. Two natural measures of the 'size' of such a family are the sum ∑ki=1|Fi| and the product ∏ki=1|Fi|. We prove new upper and lower bounds on both of these measures for general n and k≥2 which improve considerably on the previous best bounds. In particular, we construct a rich family of counterexamples to a conjecture of Gerbner, Lemons, Palmer, Patkós, and Szécsi from 2011

    On some extremal and probabilistic questions for tree posets

    Full text link
    Given two posets P,QP,Q we say that QQ is PP-free if QQ does not contain a copy of PP. The size of the largest PP-free family in 2[n]2^{[n]}, denoted by La(n,P)La(n,P), has been extensively studied since the 1980s. We consider several related problems. Indeed, for posets PP whose Hasse diagrams are trees and have radius at most 22, we prove that there are 2(1+o(1))La(n,P)2^{(1+o(1))La(n,P)} PP-free families in 2[n]2^{[n]}, thereby confirming a conjecture of Gerbner, Nagy, Patk\'os and Vizer [Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 2021] in these cases. For such PP we also resolve the random version of the PP-free problem, thus generalising the random version of Sperner's theorem due to Balogh, Mycroft and Treglown [Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, 2014], and Collares Neto and Morris [Random Structures and Algorithms, 2016]. Additionally, we make a general conjecture that, roughly speaking, asserts that subfamilies of 2[n]2^{[n]} of size sufficiently above La(n,P)La(n,P) robustly contain PP, for any poset PP whose Hasse diagram is a tree

    Random and deterministic versions of extremal poset problems

    Get PDF
    Let P(n) denote the set of all subsets of {1,...,n} and let P(n,p) be the set obtained from P(n) by selecting elements independently at random with probability p. The Boolean lattice is a partially ordered set, or poset, consisting of the elements of P(n), partially ordered by set inclusion. A basic question in extremal poset theory asks the following: Given a poset P, how big is the largest family of sets in the Boolean lattice which does not contain the structure P as a subposet? The following random analogue of this question is also of interest: Given a poset P, how big is the largest family of sets in P(n,p) which does not contain the structure P as a subposet? In this thesis, we present new proofs for a collection of deterministic extremal subposet problems. We also discuss a new technique called the Hypergraph Container Method in depth and use it to prove a random version of De Bonis and Katona\u27s (r+1)-fork-free theorem

    Existence thresholds and Ramsey properties of random posets

    Full text link
    Let P(n)\mathcal P(n) denote the power set of [n][n], ordered by inclusion, and let P(n,p)\mathcal P (n,p) denote the random poset obtained from P(n)\mathcal P(n) by retaining each element from P(n)\mathcal P (n) independently at random with probability pp and discarding it otherwise. Given any fixed poset FF we determine the threshold for the property that P(n,p)\mathcal P(n,p) contains FF as an induced subposet. We also asymptotically determine the number of copies of a fixed poset FF in P(n)\mathcal P(n). Finally, we obtain a number of results on the Ramsey properties of the random poset P(n,p)\mathcal P(n,p).Comment: 33 pages, 2 figures. Author accepted manuscript, to appear in Random Structures and Algorithm

    Maximum antichains in random subsets of a finite set

    No full text
    AbstractWe consider the random poset P(n,p) which is generated by first selecting each subset of [n]={1,…,n} with probability p and then ordering the selected subsets by inclusion. We give asymptotic estimates of the size of the maximum antichain for arbitrary p=p(n). In particular, we prove that if pn/logn→∞, an analogue of Sperner's theorem holds: almost surely the maximum antichain is (to first order) no larger than the antichain which is obtained by selecting all elements of P(n,p) with cardinality ⌊n/2⌋. This is almost surely not the case if pn=↛∞
    corecore