112,894 research outputs found
An introduction to DSmT
The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even
paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and
still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable
modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this
introduction, we present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and
paradoxical reasoning, known as Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT), developed for
dealing with imprecise, uncertain and conflicting sources of information. We
focus our presentation on the foundations of DSmT and on its most important
rules of combination, rather than on browsing specific applications of DSmT
available in literature. Several simple examples are given throughout this
presentation to show the efficiency and the generality of this new approach
Recommended from our members
Complexity, strategic thinking and organisational change
Comparative considerations of strategy from complexity paradigm and Newtonian paradigm perspectives are discussed in the light of three ideological dispositions towards the future. We term them defensive, opportunist, and goal oriented. Over the years, the strategy literature has identified a number of strategic archetypes (e.g. Miller and Freisen, 1978). What is interesting from our point of view is the patterns of reasoning that underpin them. The study of ideology has identified qualitative patterns of reasoning which underpin different types of strategic decision in both the fields of politics and strategic management. This paper considers three patterns of reasoning and considers how they relate to the complexity and Newtonian paradigms
CP-nets: A Tool for Representing and Reasoning withConditional Ceteris Paribus Preference Statements
Information about user preferences plays a key role in automated decision
making. In many domains it is desirable to assess such preferences in a
qualitative rather than quantitative way. In this paper, we propose a
qualitative graphical representation of preferences that reflects conditional
dependence and independence of preference statements under a ceteris paribus
(all else being equal) interpretation. Such a representation is often compact
and arguably quite natural in many circumstances. We provide a formal semantics
for this model, and describe how the structure of the network can be exploited
in several inference tasks, such as determining whether one outcome dominates
(is preferred to) another, ordering a set outcomes according to the preference
relation, and constructing the best outcome subject to available evidence
New perspectives on realism, tractability, and complexity in economics
Fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms are used to rework more realistic (and more complex) models of competitive markets. The resulting equilibria are significantly different from the ones predicted from the usual static analysis; the methodology solves the Walrasian problem of how markets can reach equilibrium, starting with firms trading at disparate prices.
The modified equilibria found in these complex market models involve some mutual self-restraint on the part of the agents involved, relative to economically rational behaviour. Research (using similar techniques) into the evolution of collaborative behaviours in economics, and of altruism generally, is summarized; and the joint significance of these two bodies of work for public policy is reviewed.
The possible extension of the fuzzy/ genetic methodology to other technical aspects of economics (including international trade theory, and development) is also discussed, as are the limitations to the usefulness of any type of theory in political domains. For the latter purpose, a more differentiated concept of rationality, appropriate to ill-structured choices, is developed. The philosophical case for laissez-faire policies is considered briefly; and the prospects for change in the way we ‘do economics’ are analysed
A Formal Approach based on Fuzzy Logic for the Specification of Component-Based Interactive Systems
Formal methods are widely recognized as a powerful engineering method for the
specification, simulation, development, and verification of distributed
interactive systems. However, most formal methods rely on a two-valued logic,
and are therefore limited to the axioms of that logic: a specification is valid
or invalid, component behavior is realizable or not, safety properties hold or
are violated, systems are available or unavailable. Especially when the problem
domain entails uncertainty, impreciseness, and vagueness, the appliance of such
methods becomes a challenging task. In order to overcome the limitations
resulting from the strict modus operandi of formal methods, the main objective
of this work is to relax the boolean notion of formal specifications by using
fuzzy logic. The present approach is based on Focus theory, a model-based and
strictly formal method for componentbased interactive systems. The contribution
of this work is twofold: i) we introduce a specification technique based on
fuzzy logic which can be used on top of Focus to develop formal specifications
in a qualitative fashion; ii) we partially extend Focus theory to a fuzzy one
which allows the specification of fuzzy components and fuzzy interactions.
While the former provides a methodology for approximating I/O behaviors under
imprecision, the latter enables to capture a more quantitative view of
specification properties such as realizability.Comment: In Proceedings FESCA 2015, arXiv:1503.0437
- …