Comparison of aftershock behavior of the flores sea 12 december 1992 and 14 december 2021

Over 30 years, the Flores region experienced earthquakes with Mw >7 twice, namely in 1992 and 2021 at shallow depths <60 km. However, the behavior of the aftershocks accompanying the quake has yet to be studied in detail. This research aims to compare the behavior of aftershocks after the main earthquake. This research uses three-lifetime analysis functions, namely, Wilber3, Mustang Web Browser, and comparison of Probability Density Function Hazard. The data used comes from IRIS data and BMKG Online Data. Through graphical analysis, it is known that the data for the time difference for aftershocks follow the RMS distribution, indicating that the Flores Sea aftershock on 12 December 1992 occurred with high intensity on the 3rd and the 6th day after the main earthquake. Meanwhile, the aftershocks in the Flores Sea on 14 December 2021 tended to occur with a more even intensity during the observation period, but the power returned to high on the 7th da

Tracking aftershock sequences using empirical matched field processing

Extensive aftershock sequences present a significant problem to seismological data centres attempting to produce near real-time comprehensive seismic event bulletins. An elevated number of events to process and poorer performance of automatic phase association algorithms can lead to large delays in processing and a greatly increased human workload. Global monitoring is often performed using seismic array stations at considerable distances from the events involved. Empirical matched field processing (EMFP) is a narrow-frequency band array signal processing technique that recognizes the inter-sensor phase and amplitude relations associated with wavefronts approaching a sensor array from a given direction. We demonstrate that EMFP, using a template obtained from the first P arrival from the main shock alone, can efficiently detect and identify P arrivals on that array from subsequent events in the aftershock zone with exceptionally few false alarms (signals from other sources). The empirical wavefield template encodes all the narrow-band phase and amplitude relations observed for the main shock signal. These relations are also often robust and repeatable characteristics of signals from nearby events. The EMFP detection statistic compares the phase and amplitude relations at a given time in the incoming data stream with those for the template and is sensitive to very short-duration signals with the required characteristics. Significant deviations from the plane-wavefront model that typically degrade the performance of standard beamforming techniques can enhance signal characterization using EMFP. Waveform correlation techniques typically perform poorly for aftershocks from large earthquakes due to the distances between hypocentres and the wide range of event magnitudes and source mechanisms. EMFP on remote seismic arrays mitigates these difficulties; the narrow-band nature of the procedure makes arrival identification less sensitive to the signals’ temporal form and spectral content. The empirical steering vectors derived for the main shock P arrival can reduce the frequency dependency of the slowness vector estimates. This property helps us to automatically screen out arrivals from outside of the aftershock zone. Standard array processing pipelines could be enhanced by including both plane-wave and empirical matched field steering vectors. This would maintain present capability for the plane-wave steering vectors and provide increased sensitivity and resolution for those sources for which we have empirical calibrations.Tracking aftershock sequences using empirical matched field processingacceptedVersio

Innovations in earthquake risk reduction for resilience: Recent advances and challenges

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (SFDRR) highlights the importance of scientific research, supporting the ‘availability and application of science and technology to decision making’ in disaster risk reduction (DRR). Science and technology can play a crucial role in the world’s ability to reduce casualties, physical damage, and interruption to critical infrastructure due to natural hazards and their complex interactions. The SFDRR encourages better access to technological innovations combined with increased DRR investments in developing cost-effective approaches and tackling global challenges. To this aim, it is essential to link multi- and interdisciplinary research and technological innovations with policy and engineering/DRR practice. To share knowledge and promote discussion on recent advances, challenges, and future directions on ‘Innovations in Earthquake Risk Reduction for Resilience’, a group of experts from academia and industry met in London, UK, in July 2019. The workshop focused on both cutting-edge ‘soft’ (e.g., novel modelling methods/frameworks, early warning systems, disaster financing and parametric insurance) and ‘hard’ (e.g., novel structural systems/devices for new structures and retrofitting of existing structures, sensors) risk-reduction strategies for the enhancement of structural and infrastructural earthquake safety and resilience. The workshop highlighted emerging trends and lessons from recent earthquake events and pinpointed critical issues for future research and policy interventions. This paper summarises some of the key aspects identified and discussed during the workshop to inform other researchers worldwide and extend the conversation to a broader audience, with the ultimate aim of driving change in how seismic risk is quantified and mitigated

INNOVATIONS in earthquake risk reduction for resilience: RECENT advances and challenges

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (SFDRR) highlights the importance of scientific research, supporting the ‘availability and application of science and technology to decision making’ in disaster risk reduction (DRR). Science and technology can play a crucial role in the world’s ability to reduce casualties, physical damage, and interruption to critical infrastructure due to natural hazards and their complex interactions. The SFDRR encourages better access to technological innovations combined with increased DRR investments in developing cost-effective approaches and tackling global challenges. To this aim, it is essential to link multi- and interdisciplinary research and technological innovations with policy and engineering/DRR practice. To share knowledge and promote discussion on recent advances, challenges, and future directions on ‘Innovations in Earthquake Risk Reduction for Resilience’, a group of experts from academia and industry met in London, UK, in July 2019. The workshop focused on both cutting-edge ‘soft’ (e.g., novel modelling methods/frameworks, early warning systems, disaster financing and parametric insurance) and ‘hard’ (e.g., novel structural systems/devices for new structures and retrofitting of existing structures, sensors) risk-reduction strategies for the enhancement of structural and infrastructural earthquake safety and resilience. The workshop highlighted emerging trends and lessons from recent earthquake events and pinpointed critical issues for future research and policy interventions. This paper summarises some of the key aspects identified and discussed during the workshop to inform other researchers worldwide and extend the conversation to a broader audience, with the ultimate aim of driving change in how seismic risk is quantified and mitigated

2017-2018 Boise State University Graduate Catalog

The graduate catalog describes the graduate programs offered by Boise State University and the policies, procedures, and requirements that govern those programs. Other pertinent university publications are the Boise State University Student Handbook, and the Boise State University Policy Manual. All of these publications are available online at www.boisestate.edu along with the online schedule of classes. Prospective students are also encouraged to contact the graduate program coordinator of the program of interest for additional information

2020, UMaine News Press Releases

This is a catalog of press releases put out by the University of Maine Division of Marketing and Communications between January 2, 2020 and December 15, 2020