1 research outputs found

    Encoding and Indexing of Lattice Codes

    Full text link
    Encoding and indexing of lattice codes is generalized from self-similar lattice codes to a broader class of lattices. If coding lattice Ξ›c\Lambda_{\textrm{c}} and shaping lattice Ξ›s\Lambda_{\textrm{s}} satisfy Ξ›sβŠ†Ξ›c\Lambda_{\textrm{s}} \subseteq \Lambda_{\textrm{c}}, then Ξ›c/Ξ›s\Lambda_{\textrm{c}} / \Lambda_{\textrm{s}} is a quotient group that can be used to form a (nested) lattice code C\mathcal{C}. Conway and Sloane's method of encoding and indexing does not apply when the lattices are not self-similar. Results are provided for two classes of lattices. (1) If Ξ›c\Lambda_{\textrm{c}} and Ξ›s\Lambda_{\textrm{s}} both have generator matrices in triangular form, then encoding is always possible. (2) When Ξ›c\Lambda_{\textrm{c}} and Ξ›s\Lambda_{\textrm{s}} are described by full generator matrices, if a solution to a linear diophantine equation exists, then encoding is possible. In addition, special cases where C\mathcal{C} is a cyclic code are also considered. A condition for the existence of a group homomorphism between the information and C\mathcal{C} is given. The results are applicable to a variety of coding lattices, including Construction A, Construction D and LDLCs. The D4D_4, E8E_8 and convolutional code lattices are shown to be good choices for the shaping lattice. Thus, a lattice code C\mathcal{C} can be designed by selecting Ξ›c\Lambda_{\textrm{c}} and Ξ›s\Lambda_{\textrm{s}} separately, avoiding competing design requirements of self-similar lattice codes
    corecore