1,075 research outputs found
Support-based lower bounds for the positive semidefinite rank of a nonnegative matrix
The positive semidefinite rank of a nonnegative -matrix~ is
the minimum number~ such that there exist positive semidefinite -matrices , such that S(k,\ell) =
\mbox{tr}(A_k^* B_\ell).
The most important, lower bound technique for nonnegative rank is solely
based on the support of the matrix S, i.e., its zero/non-zero pattern. In this
paper, we characterize the power of lower bounds on positive semidefinite rank
based on solely on the support.Comment: 9 page
Approximation Limits of Linear Programs (Beyond Hierarchies)
We develop a framework for approximation limits of polynomial-size linear
programs from lower bounds on the nonnegative ranks of suitably defined
matrices. This framework yields unconditional impossibility results that are
applicable to any linear program as opposed to only programs generated by
hierarchies. Using our framework, we prove that O(n^{1/2-eps})-approximations
for CLIQUE require linear programs of size 2^{n^\Omega(eps)}. (This lower bound
applies to linear programs using a certain encoding of CLIQUE as a linear
optimization problem.) Moreover, we establish a similar result for
approximations of semidefinite programs by linear programs. Our main ingredient
is a quantitative improvement of Razborov's rectangle corruption lemma for the
high error regime, which gives strong lower bounds on the nonnegative rank of
certain perturbations of the unique disjointness matrix.Comment: 23 pages, 2 figure
Exponential Lower Bounds for Polytopes in Combinatorial Optimization
We solve a 20-year old problem posed by Yannakakis and prove that there
exists no polynomial-size linear program (LP) whose associated polytope
projects to the traveling salesman polytope, even if the LP is not required to
be symmetric. Moreover, we prove that this holds also for the cut polytope and
the stable set polytope. These results were discovered through a new connection
that we make between one-way quantum communication protocols and semidefinite
programming reformulations of LPs.Comment: 19 pages, 4 figures. This version of the paper will appear in the
Journal of the ACM. The earlier conference version in STOC'12 had the title
"Linear vs. Semidefinite Extended Formulations: Exponential Separation and
Strong Lower Bounds
The matching polytope does not admit fully-polynomial size relaxation schemes
The groundbreaking work of Rothvo{\ss} [arxiv:1311.2369] established that
every linear program expressing the matching polytope has an exponential number
of inequalities (formally, the matching polytope has exponential extension
complexity). We generalize this result by deriving strong bounds on the
polyhedral inapproximability of the matching polytope: for fixed , every polyhedral -approximation
requires an exponential number of inequalities, where is the number of
vertices. This is sharp given the well-known -approximation of size
provided by the odd-sets of size up to
. Thus matching is the first problem in , whose natural
linear encoding does not admit a fully polynomial-size relaxation scheme (the
polyhedral equivalent of an FPTAS), which provides a sharp separation from the
polynomial-size relaxation scheme obtained e.g., via constant-sized odd-sets
mentioned above.
Our approach reuses ideas from Rothvo{\ss} [arxiv:1311.2369], however the
main lower bounding technique is different. While the original proof is based
on the hyperplane separation bound (also called the rectangle corruption
bound), we employ the information-theoretic notion of common information as
introduced in Braun and Pokutta [http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2013/056/],
which allows to analyze perturbations of slack matrices. It turns out that the
high extension complexity for the matching polytope stem from the same source
of hardness as for the correlation polytope: a direct sum structure.Comment: 21 pages, 3 figure
Improving Efficiency and Scalability of Sum of Squares Optimization: Recent Advances and Limitations
It is well-known that any sum of squares (SOS) program can be cast as a
semidefinite program (SDP) of a particular structure and that therein lies the
computational bottleneck for SOS programs, as the SDPs generated by this
procedure are large and costly to solve when the polynomials involved in the
SOS programs have a large number of variables and degree. In this paper, we
review SOS optimization techniques and present two new methods for improving
their computational efficiency. The first method leverages the sparsity of the
underlying SDP to obtain computational speed-ups. Further improvements can be
obtained if the coefficients of the polynomials that describe the problem have
a particular sparsity pattern, called chordal sparsity. The second method
bypasses semidefinite programming altogether and relies instead on solving a
sequence of more tractable convex programs, namely linear and second order cone
programs. This opens up the question as to how well one can approximate the
cone of SOS polynomials by second order representable cones. In the last part
of the paper, we present some recent negative results related to this question.Comment: Tutorial for CDC 201
- …