Why don't people use character-level machine translation?

We present a literature and empirical survey that critically assesses the state of the art in character-level modeling for machine translation (MT). Despite evidence in the literature that character-level systems are comparable with subword systems, they are virtually never used in competitive setups in WMT competitions. We empirically show that even with recent modeling innovations in character-level natural language processing, character-level MT systems still struggle to match their subword-based counterparts. Character-level MT systems show neither better domain robustness, nor better morphological generalization, despite being often so motivated. However, we are able to show robustness towards source side noise and that translation quality does not degrade with increasing beam size at decoding time.Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures; Findings of ACL 2022, camera-read

Learning Character-level Compositionality with Visual Features

Previous work has modeled the compositionality of words by creating character-level models of meaning, reducing problems of sparsity for rare words. However, in many writing systems compositionality has an effect even on the character-level: the meaning of a character is derived by the sum of its parts. In this paper, we model this effect by creating embeddings for characters based on their visual characteristics, creating an image for the character and running it through a convolutional neural network to produce a visual character embedding. Experiments on a text classification task demonstrate that such model allows for better processing of instances with rare characters in languages such as Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Additionally, qualitative analyses demonstrate that our proposed model learns to focus on the parts of characters that carry semantic content, resulting in embeddings that are coherent in visual space.Comment: Accepted to ACL 201

Domain adaptation for neural machine translation

The development of deep learning techniques has allowed Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models to become extremely powerful, given sufficient training data and training time. However, such translation models struggle when translating text of a specific domain. A domain may consist of text on a well-defined topic, or text of unknown provenance with an identifiable vocabulary distribution, or language with some other stylometric feature. While NMT models can achieve good translation performance on domain-specific data via simple tuning on a representative training corpus, such data-centric approaches have negative side-effects. These include over-fitting, brittleness, and `catastrophic forgetting' of previous training examples. In this thesis we instead explore more robust approaches to domain adaptation for NMT. We consider the case where a system is adapted to a specified domain of interest, but may also need to accommodate new language, or domain-mismatched sentences. We explore techniques relating to data selection and curriculum, model parameter adaptation procedure, and inference procedure. We show that iterative fine-tuning can achieve strong performance over multiple related domains, and that Elastic Weight Consolidation can be used to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in NMT domain adaptation across multiple sequential domains. We develop a robust variant of Minimum Risk Training which allows more beneficial use of small, highly domain-specific tuning sets than simple cross-entropy fine-tuning, and can mitigate exposure bias resulting from domain over-fitting. We extend Bayesian Interpolation inference schemes to Neural Machine Translation, allowing adaptive weighting of NMT ensembles to translate text from an unknown domain. Finally we demonstrate the benefit of multi-domain adaptation approaches for other lines of NMT research. We show that NMT systems using multiple forms of data representation can benefit from multi-domain inference approaches. We also demonstrate a series of domain adaptation approaches to mitigating the effects of gender bias in machine translation