Integrated approaches to prosodic word prediction for Chinese TTS

We focus on integrated prosodic word prediction for Chinese TTS. To avoid the problem of inconsistency between lexical words and prosodic words in Chinese, lexical word segmentation and prosodic word prediction are taken as one process instead of two independent tasks. Furthermore, two word-based approaches are proposed to drive this integrated prosodic word prediction: The first one follows the notion of lexicalized hidden Markov models, and the second one is borrowed from unknown word identification for Chinese. The results of our primary experiment show these integrated approaches are effective.published_or_final_versio

© Computational Linguistics Society of R.O.C. Locating Boundaries for Prosodic Constituents in Unrestricted Mandarin Texts

This paper proposes a three-tier prosodic hierarchy, including prosodic word, intermediate phrase and intonational phrase tiers, for Mandarin that emphasizes the use of the prosodic word instead of the lexical word as the basic prosodic unit. Both the surface difference and perceptual difference show that this is helpful for achieving high naturalness in text-to-speech conversion. Three approaches, the basic CART approach, the bottom-up hierarchical approach and the modified hierarchical approach, are presented for locating the boundaries of three prosodic constituents in unrestricted Mandarin texts. Two sets of features are used in the basic CART method: one contains syntactic phrasal information and the other does not. The one with syntactic phrasal information results in about a 1 % increase in accuracy and an 11% decrease in error-cost. The performance of the modified hierarchical method produces the highest accuracy, 83%, and lowest error cost when no syntactic phrasal information is provided. It shows advantages in detecting the boundaries of intonational phrases at locations without breaking punctuation. 71.1 % precision and 52.4 % recall are achieved. Experiments on acceptability reveal that only 26 % of the mis-assigned break indices are real infelicitous errors, and that the perceptual difference between the automatically assigned break indices and the manually annotated break indices are small