Approximation Algorithms for Energy, Reliability, and Makespan Optimization Problems

International audienceWe consider the problem of scheduling an application on a parallel computational platform. The application is a particular task graph, either a linear chain of tasks, or a set of independent tasks. The platform is made of identical processors, whose speed can be dynamically modified. It is also subject to failures: if a processor is slowed down to decrease the energy consumption, it has a higher chance to fail. Therefore, the scheduling problem requires us to re-execute or replicate tasks (i.e., execute twice the same task, either on the same processor, or on two distinct processors), in order to increase the reliability. It is a tri-criteria problem: the goal is to minimize the energy consumption, while enforcing a bound on the total execution time (the makespan), and a constraint on the reliability of each task. Our main contribution is to propose approximation algorithms for linear chains of tasks and independent tasks. For linear chains, we design a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme. However, we show that there exists no constant factor approximation algorithm for independent tasks, unless P=NP, and we propose in this case an approximation algorithm with a relaxation on the makespan constraint

Efficient Algorithms for Scheduling Moldable Tasks

We study the problem of scheduling $n$ independent moldable tasks on $m$ processors that arises in large-scale parallel computations. When tasks are monotonic, the best known result is a $(\frac{3}{2}+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for makespan minimization with a complexity linear in $n$ and polynomial in $\log{m}$ and $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ where $\epsilon$ is arbitrarily small. We propose a new perspective of the existing speedup models: the speedup of a task $T_{j}$ is linear when the number $p$ of assigned processors is small (up to a threshold $\delta_{j}$) while it presents monotonicity when $p$ ranges in $[\delta_{j}, k_{j}]$; the bound $k_{j}$ indicates an unacceptable overhead when parallelizing on too many processors. For a given integer $\delta\geq 5$, let $u=\left\lceil \sqrt[2]{\delta} \right\rceil-1$. In this paper, we propose a $\frac{1}{\theta(\delta)} (1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for makespan minimization with a complexity $\mathcal{O}(n\log{\frac{n}{\epsilon}}\log{m})$ where $\theta(\delta) = \frac{u+1}{u+2}\left( 1- \frac{k}{m} \right)$ ($m\gg k$). As a by-product, we also propose a $\theta(\delta)$-approximation algorithm for throughput maximization with a common deadline with a complexity $\mathcal{O}(n^{2}\log{m})$

GraphLab: A New Framework for Parallel Machine Learning

Designing and implementing efficient, provably correct parallel machine learning (ML) algorithms is challenging. Existing high-level parallel abstractions like MapReduce are insufficiently expressive while low-level tools like MPI and Pthreads leave ML experts repeatedly solving the same design challenges. By targeting common patterns in ML, we developed GraphLab, which improves upon abstractions like MapReduce by compactly expressing asynchronous iterative algorithms with sparse computational dependencies while ensuring data consistency and achieving a high degree of parallel performance. We demonstrate the expressiveness of the GraphLab framework by designing and implementing parallel versions of belief propagation, Gibbs sampling, Co-EM, Lasso and Compressed Sensing. We show that using GraphLab we can achieve excellent parallel performance on large scale real-world problems

Scheduling multiple divisible loads on a linear processor network

Min, Veeravalli, and Barlas have recently proposed strategies to minimize the overall execution time of one or several divisible loads on a heterogeneous linear network, using one or more installments. We show on a very simple example that their approach does not always produce a solution and that, when it does, the solution is often suboptimal. We also show how to find an optimal schedule for any instance, once the number of installments per load is given. Then, we formally state that any optimal schedule has an infinite number of installments under a linear cost model as the one assumed in the original papers. Therefore, such a cost model cannot be used to design practical multi-installment strategies. Finally, through extensive simulations we confirmed that the best solution is always produced by the linear programming approach, while solutions of the original papers can be far away from the optimal

Scheduling Monotone Moldable Jobs in Linear Time

A moldable job is a job that can be executed on an arbitrary number of processors, and whose processing time depends on the number of processors allotted to it. A moldable job is monotone if its work doesn't decrease for an increasing number of allotted processors. We consider the problem of scheduling monotone moldable jobs to minimize the makespan. We argue that for certain compact input encodings a polynomial algorithm has a running time polynomial in n and log(m), where n is the number of jobs and m is the number of machines. We describe how monotony of jobs can be used to counteract the increased problem complexity that arises from compact encodings, and give tight bounds on the approximability of the problem with compact encoding: it is NP-hard to solve optimally, but admits a PTAS. The main focus of this work are efficient approximation algorithms. We describe different techniques to exploit the monotony of the jobs for better running times, and present a (3/2+{\epsilon})-approximate algorithm whose running time is polynomial in log(m) and 1/{\epsilon}, and only linear in the number n of jobs

Scheduling MapReduce Jobs under Multi-Round Precedences

We consider non-preemptive scheduling of MapReduce jobs with multiple tasks in the practical scenario where each job requires several map-reduce rounds. We seek to minimize the average weighted completion time and consider scheduling on identical and unrelated parallel processors. For identical processors, we present LP-based O(1)-approximation algorithms. For unrelated processors, the approximation ratio naturally depends on the maximum number of rounds of any job. Since the number of rounds per job in typical MapReduce algorithms is a small constant, our scheduling algorithms achieve a small approximation ratio in practice. For the single-round case, we substantially improve on previously best known approximation guarantees for both identical and unrelated processors. Moreover, we conduct an experimental analysis and compare the performance of our algorithms against a fast heuristic and a lower bound on the optimal solution, thus demonstrating their promising practical performance