25,596 research outputs found

    Data management of nanometre­ scale CMOS device simulations

    Get PDF
    In this paper we discuss the problems arising in managing and curating the data generated by simulations of nanometre scale CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide Semiconductor) transistors, circuits and systems and describe the software and operational techniques we have adopted to address them. Such simulations pose a number of challenges including, inter alia, multi­TByte data volumes, complex datasets with complex inter-relations between datasets, multi­-institutional collaborations including multiple specialisms and a mixture of academic and industrial partners, and demanding security requirements driven by commercial imperatives. This work was undertaken as part of the NanoCMOS project. However, the problems, solutions and experience seem likely to be of wider relevance, both within the CMOS design community and more generally in other disciplines

    The Liberal Legacy of Bush v. Gore

    Get PDF
    This article examines the last ten years of the Rehnquist Court, which was divided evenly by the Court\u27s highly controversial intervention in the 2000 presidential election, Bush v. Gore. I compare the Court\u27s record before and after that decision both qualitatively and quantitatively, and argue that the Court shifted noticeably to the left, particularly in high-profile cases, after Bush v. Gore, as conservative Justices showed a greater willingness to side with their liberal colleagues to reach liberal results. I hypothesize that this may have reflected an effort, conscious or subconscious, to restore the Court\u27s legitimacy by counteracting images of a partisan body divided along political lines. I also suggest that the same interest in restoring the legitimacy of the Court may have contributed to the Court\u27s substantive emphasis on the values of the rule of law, which was particularly evident in the Court\u27s enemy combatant decisions of 2004 (and for that matter, more recently, in the Court\u27s decision on military tribunals in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld). This liberal legacy of Bush v. Gore illustrates one of the checking functions on judicial supremacy - namely the need to maintain the appearance (and reality) that law is distinct from politics. Whether the Bush v. Gore effect will continue with the Roberts Court remains to be seen

    Confederate Diplomacy and the Texas-Mexican Border, 1861-1865

    Get PDF

    Change Is Constant in Estate Planning: Reflections of an ACTEC Law Journal Editor

    Get PDF
    Change is the only constant in the life of a trusts and estates professional. The law changes; the needs of clients change; the methods for achieving certain results change; technology and modes of communication change. So, too, it can be said that change is the only constant running through more than forty years of our organization\u27s flagship publication

    Cascade diagrams for depicting complex interventions in randomised trials

    Get PDF
    Many medical interventions—particularly non-pharmacological ones—are complex, consisting of multiple interacting components targeted at different organisational levels.1 2 Published descriptions of complex interventions often do not contain enough detail to enable their replication.2-5 Reports of behaviour change interventions should include descriptions of setting, mode, intensity, and duration, and characteristics of the participants.6 Graphical methods, such as that showing the relative timing of assessments and intervention components,7 may improve clarity of reporting. However, these approaches do not reveal the connections between the different “actors” in a complex intervention.8 Different audiences may want different things from a description of an intervention, but visualising relationships between actors can clarify crucial features such as the fidelity with which the intervention is passed down a chain of actors and possible routes of contamination between treatment arms. Here we describe a new graphical approach—the cascade diagram—that highlights these potential problems

    Standards in Library Technology

    Get PDF
    published or submitted for publicatio

    Time to publication for NIHR HTA programme-funded research: a cohort study

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveTo assess the time to publication of primary research and evidence syntheses funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme published as a monograph in Health Technology Assessment and as a journal article in the wider biomedical literature.Study designRetrospective cohort study.SettingPrimary research and evidence synthesis projects funded by the HTA Programme were included in the cohort if they were registered in the NIHR research programmes database and was planned to submit the draft final report for publication in Health Technology Assessment on or before 9 December 2011.Main outcome measuresThe median time to publication and publication at 30?months in Health Technology Assessment and in an external journal were determined by searching the NIHR research programmes database and HTA Programme website.ResultsOf 458 included projects, 184 (40.2%) were primary research projects and 274 (59.8%) were evidence syntheses. A total of 155 primary research projects had a completion date; the median time to publication was 23?months (26.5 and 35.5?months to publish a monograph and to publish in an external journal, respectively) and 69% were published within 30?months. The median time to publication of HTA-funded trials (n=126) was 24?months and 67.5% were published within 30?months. Among the evidence syntheses with a protocol online date (n=223), the median time to publication was 25.5?months (28?months to publication as a monograph), but only 44.4% of evidence synthesis projects were published in an external journal. 65% of evidence synthesis studies had been published within 30.0?months.ConclusionsResearch funded by the HTA Programme publishes promptly. The importance of Health Technology Assessment was highlighted as the median time to publication was 9?months shorter for a monograph than an external journal article

    Instructions to Authors

    Get PDF
    corecore