1,151 research outputs found

    Testing isomorphism of central Cayley graphs over almost simple groups in polynomial time

    Full text link
    A Cayley graph over a group G is said to be central if its connection set is a normal subset of G. It is proved that for any two central Cayley graphs over explicitly given almost simple groups of order n, the set of all isomorphisms from the first graph onto the second can be found in time poly(n).Comment: 20 page

    Every finite group has a normal bi-Cayley graph

    Full text link
    A graph \G with a group HH of automorphisms acting semiregularly on the vertices with two orbits is called a {\em bi-Cayley graph} over HH. When HH is a normal subgroup of \Aut(\G), we say that \G is {\em normal} with respect to HH. In this paper, we show that every finite group has a connected normal bi-Cayley graph. This improves Theorem~5 of [M. Arezoomand, B. Taeri, Normality of 2-Cayley digraphs, Discrete Math. 338 (2015) 41--47], and provides a positive answer to the Question of the above paper

    On separability of Schur rings over abelian p-groups

    Full text link
    An SS-ring (Schur ring) is called separable with respect to a class of SS-rings K\mathcal{K} if it is determined up to isomorphism in K\mathcal{K} only by the tensor of its structure constants. An abelian group is said to be separable if every SS-ring over this group is separable with respect to the class of SS-rings over abelian groups. Let CnC_n be a cyclic group of order nn and GG be a noncylic abelian pp-group. From the previously obtained results it follows that if GG is separable then GG is isomorphic to Cp×CpkC_p\times C_{p^k} or Cp×Cp×CpkC_p\times C_p\times C_{p^k}, where p∈{2,3}p\in \{2,3\} and k≥1k\geq 1. We prove that the groups D=Cp×CpkD=C_p\times C_{p^k} are separable whenever p∈{2,3}p\in \{2,3\}. From this statement we deduce that a given Cayley graph over DD and a given Cayley graph over an arbitrary abelian group one can check whether these graphs are isomorphic in time ∣D∣O(1)|D|^{O(1)}

    The Cayley isomorphism property for the group C25×CpC^5_2\times C_p

    Full text link
    A finite group GG is called a DCI-group if two Cayley digraphs over GG are isomorphic if and only if their connection sets are conjugate by a group automorphism. We prove that the group C25×CpC_2^5\times C_p, where pp is a prime, is a DCI-group if and only if p≠2p\neq 2. Together with the previously obtained results, this implies that a group GG of order 32p32p, where pp is a prime, is a DCI-group if and only if p≠2p\neq 2 and G≅C25×CpG\cong C_2^5\times C_p.Comment: 19 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2003.08118, arXiv:1912.0883

    A solution of an equivalence problem for semisimple cyclic codes

    Full text link
    In this paper we propose an efficient solution of an equivalence problem for semisimple cyclic codes

    Degree distributions for a class of Circulant graphs

    Full text link
    We characterize the equivalence and the weak equivalence of Cayley graphs for a finite group \C{A}. Using these characterizations, we find degree distribution polynomials for weak equivalence of some graphs including 1) circulant graphs of prime power order, 2) circulant graphs of order 4p4p, 3) circulant graphs of square free order and 4) Cayley graphs of order pp or 2p2p. As an application, we find an enumeration formula for the number of weak equivalence classes of circulant graphs of prime power order, order 4p4p and square free order and Cayley graphs of order pp or 2p2p

    A novel characterization of cubic Hamiltonian graphs via the associated quartic graphs

    Full text link
    We give a necessary and sufficient condition for a cubic graph to be Hamiltonian by analyzing Eulerian tours in certain spanning subgraphs of the quartic graph associated with the cubic graph by 1-factor contraction. This correspondence is most useful in the case when it induces a blue and red 2-factorization of the associated quartic graph. We use this condition to characterize the Hamiltonian I-graphs, a further generalization of generalized Petersen graphs. The characterization of Hamiltonian I-graphs follows from the fact that one can choose a 1-factor in any I-graph in such a way that the corresponding associated quartic graph is a graph bundle having a cycle graph as base graph and a fiber and the fundamental factorization of graph bundles playing the role of blue and red factorization. The techniques that we develop allow us to represent Cayley multigraphs of degree 4, that are associated to abelian groups, as graph bundles. Moreover, we can find a family of connected cubic (multi)graphs that contains the family of connected I-graphs as a subfamily

    The Cayley isomorphism property for Cayley maps

    Full text link
    In this paper we study finite groups which have Cayley isomorphism property with respect to Cayley maps, CIM-groups for a brief. We show that the structure of the CIM-groups is very restricted. It is described in Theorem~\ref{111015a} where a short list of possible candidates for CIM-groups is given. Theorem~\ref{111015c} provides concrete examples of infinite series of CIM-groups

    Non-abelian finite groups whose character sums are invariant but are not Cayley isomorphism

    Full text link
    Let GG be a group and SS an inverse closed subset of G∖{1}G\setminus \{1\}. By a Cayley graph Cay(G,S)Cay(G,S) we mean the graph whose vertex set is the set of elements of GG and two vertices xx and yy are adjacent if x−1y∈Sx^{-1}y\in S. A group GG is called a CI-group if Cay(G,S)≅Cay(G,T)Cay(G,S)\cong Cay(G,T) for some inverse closed subsets SS and TT of G∖{1}G\setminus \{1\}, then Sα=TS^\alpha=T for some automorphism α\alpha of GG. A finite group GG is called a BI-group if Cay(G,S)≅Cay(G,T)Cay(G,S)\cong Cay(G,T) for some inverse closed subsets SS and TT of G∖{1}G\setminus \{1\}, then MνS=MνTM_\nu^S=M_\nu^T for all positive integers ν\nu, where MνSM_\nu^S denotes the set {∑s∈Sχ(s)∣χ(1)=ν,χ is a complex irreducible character of G}\big\{\sum_{s\in S}\chi(s) | \chi(1)=\nu, \chi \text{ is a complex irreducible character of } G \big\}. It was asked by L\'aszl\'o Babai [\textit{J. Combin. Theory Ser. B}, {\bf 27} (1979) 180-189] if every finite group is a BI-group; various examples of finite non BI-groups are presented in [\textit{Comm. Algebra}, {\bf 43} (12) (2015) 5159-5167]. It is noted in the latter paper that every finite CI-group is a BI-group and all abelian finite groups are BI-groups. However it is known that there are finite abelian non CI-groups. Existence of a finite non-abelian BI-group which is not a CI-group is the main question which we study here. We find two non-abelian BI-groups of orders 2020 and 4242 which are not CI-groups. We also list all BI-groups of orders up to 3030

    On separable abelian pp-groups

    Full text link
    An SS-ring (a Schur ring) is said to be separable with respect to a class of groups K\mathcal{K} if every algebraic isomorphism from the SS-ring in question to an SS-ring over a group from K\mathcal{K} is induced by a combinatorial isomorphism. A finite group is said to be \emph{separable} with respect to K\mathcal{K} if every SS-ring over this group is separable with respect to K\mathcal{K}. We provide a complete classification of abelian pp-groups separable with respect to the class of abelian groups.Comment: 12 page
    • …
    corecore