2 research outputs found
Isogeometric Residual Minimization Method (iGRM) with Direction Splitting Preconditoner for Stationary Advection-Diffusion Problems
In this paper, we introduce the isoGeometric Residual Minimization (iGRM)
method. The method solves stationary advection-dominated diffusion problems. We
stabilize the method via residual minimization. We discretize the problem using
B-spline basis functions. We then seek to minimize the isogeometric residual
over a spline space built on a tensor product mesh. We construct the solution
over a smooth subspace of the residual. We can specify the solution subspace by
reducing the polynomial order, by increasing the continuity, or by a
combination of these. The Gramm matrix for the residual minimization method is
approximated by a weighted H1 norm, which we can express as Kronecker products,
due to the tensor-product structure of the approximations. We use the Gramm
matrix as a preconditional which can be applied in a computational cost
proportional to the number of degrees of freedom in 2D and 3D. Building on
these approximations, we construct an iterative algorithm. We test the residual
minimization method on several numerical examples, and we compare it to the
Discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin (DPG) and the Streamline Upwind Petrov-Galerkin
(SUPG) stabilization methods. The iGRM method delivers similar quality
solutions as the DPG method, it uses smaller grids, it does not require
breaking of the spaces, but it is limited to tensor-product meshes. The
computational cost of the iGRM is higher than for SUPG, but it does not require
the determination of problem specific parameters.Comment: 27 pages, 4 figure
Isogeometric analysis with piece-wise constant test functions
We focus on the finite element method computations with higher-order C1
continuity basis functions that preserve the partition of unity. We show that
the rows of the system of linear equations can be combined, and the test
functions can be sum up to 1 using the partition of unity property at the
quadrature points. Thus, the test functions in higher continuity IGA can be set
to piece-wise constants. This formulation is equivalent to testing with
piece-wise constant basis functions, with supports span over some parts of the
domain. The resulting method is a Petrov-Galerkin formulation with piece-wise
constant test functions. This observation has the following consequences. The
numerical integration cost can be reduced because we do not need to evaluate
the test functions since they are equal to 1. This observation is valid for any
basis functions preserving the partition of unity property. It is independent
of the problem dimension and geometry of the computational domain. It also can
be used in time-dependent problems, e.g., in the explicit dynamics
computations, where we can reduce the cost of generation of the right-hand
side. This summation of test functions can be performed for an arbitrary linear
differential operator resulting from the Galerkin method applied to a PDE where
we discretize with C1 continuity basis functions. The resulting method is
equivalent to a linear combination of the collocations at points and with
weights resulting from applied quadrature over the spans defined by supports of
the piece-wise constant test functions.Comment: 32 pages, 8 figure