42 research outputs found
Introduction to Cirquent Calculus and Abstract Resource Semantics
This paper introduces a refinement of the sequent calculus approach called
cirquent calculus. While in Gentzen-style proof trees sibling (or cousin, etc.)
sequents are disjoint sequences of formulas, in cirquent calculus they are
permitted to share elements. Explicitly allowing or disallowing shared
resources and thus taking to a more subtle level the resource-awareness
intuitions underlying substructural logics, cirquent calculus offers much
greater flexibility and power than sequent calculus does. A need for
substantially new deductive tools came with the birth of computability logic
(see http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~giorgi/cl.html) - the semantically constructed
formal theory of computational resources, which has stubbornly resisted any
axiomatization attempts within the framework of traditional syntactic
approaches. Cirquent calculus breaks the ice. Removing contraction from the
full collection of its rules yields a sound and complete system for the basic
fragment CL5 of computability logic. Doing the same in sequent calculus, on the
other hand, throws out the baby with the bath water, resulting in the strictly
weaker affine logic. An implied claim of computability logic is that it is CL5
rather than affine logic that adequately materializes the resource philosophy
traditionally associated with the latter. To strengthen this claim, the paper
further introduces an abstract resource semantics and shows the soundness and
completeness of CL5 with respect to it.Comment: To appear in Journal of Logic and Computatio
Cirquent calculus deepened
Cirquent calculus is a new proof-theoretic and semantic framework, whose main
distinguishing feature is being based on circuits, as opposed to the more
traditional approaches that deal with tree-like objects such as formulas or
sequents. Among its advantages are greater efficiency, flexibility and
expressiveness. This paper presents a detailed elaboration of a deep-inference
cirquent logic, which is naturally and inherently resource conscious. It shows
that classical logic, both syntactically and semantically, is just a special,
conservative fragment of this more general and, in a sense, more basic logic --
the logic of resources in the form of cirquent calculus. The reader will find
various arguments in favor of switching to the new framework, such as arguments
showing the insufficiency of the expressive power of linear logic or other
formula-based approaches to developing resource logics, exponential
improvements over the traditional approaches in both representational and proof
complexities offered by cirquent calculus, and more. Among the main purposes of
this paper is to provide an introductory-style starting point for what, as the
author wishes to hope, might have a chance to become a new line of research in
proof theory -- a proof theory based on circuits instead of formulas.Comment: Significant improvements over the previous version
The Computational Complexity of Propositional Cirquent Calculus
Introduced in 2006 by Japaridze, cirquent calculus is a refinement of sequent
calculus. The advent of cirquent calculus arose from the need for a deductive
system with a more explicit ability to reason about resources. Unlike the more
traditional proof-theoretic approaches that manipulate tree-like objects
(formulas, sequents, etc.), cirquent calculus is based on circuit-style
structures called cirquents, in which different "peer" (sibling, cousin, etc.)
substructures may share components. It is this resource sharing mechanism to
which cirquent calculus owes its novelty (and its virtues). From its inception,
cirquent calculus has been paired with an abstract resource semantics. This
semantics allows for reasoning about the interaction between a resource
provider and a resource user, where resources are understood in the their most
general and intuitive sense. Interpreting resources in a more restricted
computational sense has made cirquent calculus instrumental in axiomatizing
various fundamental fragments of Computability Logic, a formal theory of
(interactive) computability. The so-called "classical" rules of cirquent
calculus, in the absence of the particularly troublesome contraction rule,
produce a sound and complete system CL5 for Computability Logic. In this paper,
we investigate the computational complexity of CL5, showing it is
-complete. We also show that CL5 without the duplication rule has
polynomial size proofs and is NP-complete
The taming of recurrences in computability logic through cirquent calculus, Part I
This paper constructs a cirquent calculus system and proves its soundness and
completeness with respect to the semantics of computability logic (see
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~giorgi/cl.html). The logical vocabulary of the system
consists of negation, parallel conjunction, parallel disjunction, branching
recurrence, and branching corecurrence. The article is published in two parts,
with (the present) Part I containing preliminaries and a soundness proof, and
(the forthcoming) Part II containing a completeness proof