Rhythms of “being” at ISIC - Understanding the place of the ISIC conferences in information seeking research

© the authors, 2008. Results. People attend ISIC conferences because of a desire to connect with researchers, not necessarily because of specific research (areas). However, the interests of ISIC 2006 participants fall well within the core themes and clusters characterising ISIC papers since 1996. Conclusions. The project contributes to a fuller understanding of the interlacing of research and information practices and ISIC's contribution to information behaviour research.Introduction. The paper reports on findings from a project merging exploring the professional practice of academics, research students and practitioners within the ISIC community, drawn from fieldwork at the 2006 Information Seeking in Context (ISIC 2006) conference in Sydney, Australia.Method. The project used diverse ethnographic and unobtrusive techniques to locate and describe the range of activities taking place during the 2006 ISIC conference.Analysis. Both authors names and conference titles were collected from all conferences and mapped to see if core themes could be identified. Themes were compared to the topics of interest elicited from two conference surveys distributed at ISIC 2006

Information interaction among computer scientists. A longitudinal study.

Introduction. The information behaviour of a group of Swedish computer scientists has been studied over a period of 20 years (1987-2006). Changes in their information seeking are addressed in terms of collaboration levels and discussed as examples of social practice. Method. Qualitative interviewing has been the main method for data collection. Analysis. Interview transcripts have been content analysed by means of data reduction and data displays. Results. The original study of the group in the late 1980s showed that interaction between group members was frequent and integrated social, collegial and informational aspects. They served as informal information providers for each other and their information seeking was predominantly internal within the department. It is clear from preliminary results of the follow-up study that the pattern of social interaction between the remaining five group members has changed dramatically. Today collegial interaction is mostly limited to the individuals' research teams. Social interaction and interaction for information purposes among the subjects are sparse. In Talja's (2002) terminology they have moved from social sharing within the group of team leaders to strategic sharing within their research teams. The scientists studied still prefer informal information seeking, but their information interaction is now mostly external and the social qualities of this interaction have changed. Conclusions. The conclusions indicate that information behaviour in this group are based on social and professional practices that have undergone fundamental changes in the past 20 years