189 research outputs found

    Cyclic proof systems for modal fixpoint logics

    Get PDF
    This thesis is about cyclic and ill-founded proof systems for modal fixpoint logics, with and without explicit fixpoint quantifiers.Cyclic and ill-founded proof-theory allow proofs with infinite branches or paths, as long as they satisfy some correctness conditions ensuring the validity of the conclusion. In this dissertation we design a few cyclic and ill-founded systems: a cyclic one for the weak Grzegorczyk modal logic K4Grz, based on our explanation of the phenomenon of cyclic companionship; and ill-founded and cyclic ones for the full computation tree logic CTL* and the intuitionistic linear-time temporal logic iLTL. All systems are cut-free, and the cyclic ones for K4Grz and iLTL have fully finitary correctness conditions.Lastly, we use a cyclic system for the modal mu-calculus to obtain a proof of the uniform interpolation property for the logic which differs from the original, automata-based one

    Bootstrapping extensionality

    Get PDF
    Intuitionistic type theory is a formal system designed by Per Martin-Loef to be a full-fledged foundation in which to develop constructive mathematics. One particular variant, intensional type theory (ITT), features nice computational properties like decidable type-checking, making it especially suitable for computer implementation. However, as traditionally defined, ITT lacks many vital extensionality principles, such as function extensionality. We would like to extend ITT with the desired extensionality principles while retaining its convenient computational behaviour. To do so, we must first understand the extent of its expressive power, from its strengths to its limitations. The contents of this thesis are an investigation into intensional type theory, and in particular into its power to express extensional concepts. We begin, in the first part, by developing an extension to the strict setoid model of type theory with a universe of setoids. The model construction is carried out in a minimal intensional type theoretic metatheory, thus providing a way to bootstrap extensionality by ``compiling'' it down to a few building blocks such as inductive families and proof-irrelevance. In the second part of the thesis we explore inductive-inductive types (ITTs) and their relation to simpler forms of induction in an intensional setting. We develop a general method to reduce a subclass of infinitary IITs to inductive families, via an encoding that can be expressed in ITT without any extensionality besides proof-irrelevance. Our results contribute to further understand IITs and the expressive power of intensional type theory, and can be of practical use when formalizing mathematics in proof assistants that do not natively support induction-induction

    Enriched universal algebra

    Full text link
    Following the classical approach of Birkhoff, we introduce enriched universal algebra. Given a suitable base of enrichment V\mathcal V, we define a language L\mathbb L to be a collection of (X,Y)(X,Y)-ary function symbols whose arities are taken among the objects of V\mathcal V. The class of L\mathbb L-terms is constructed recursively from the symbols of L\mathbb L, the morphisms in V\mathcal V, and by incorporating the monoidal structure of V\mathcal V. Then, L\mathbb L-structures and interpretations of terms are defined, leading to enriched equational theories. In this framework we prove several fundamental theorems of universal algebra, including the characterization of algebras for finitary monads on V\mathcal V as models of an equational theories, and several Birkhoff-type theorems

    LIPIcs, Volume 261, ICALP 2023, Complete Volume

    Get PDF
    LIPIcs, Volume 261, ICALP 2023, Complete Volum

    Normal Form Bisimulations By Value

    Full text link
    Normal form bisimilarities are a natural form of program equivalence resting on open terms, first introduced by Sangiorgi in call-by-name. The literature contains a normal form bisimilarity for Plotkin's call-by-value λ\lambda-calculus, Lassen's \emph{enf bisimilarity}, which validates all of Moggi's monadic laws and can be extended to validate η\eta. It does not validate, however, other relevant principles, such as the identification of meaningless terms -- validated instead by Sangiorgi's bisimilarity -- or the commutation of \letexps. These shortcomings are due to issues with open terms of Plotkin's calculus. We introduce a new call-by-value normal form bisimilarity, deemed \emph{net bisimilarity}, closer in spirit to Sangiorgi's and satisfying the additional principles. We develop it on top of an existing formalism designed for dealing with open terms in call-by-value. It turns out that enf and net bisimilarities are \emph{incomparable}, as net bisimilarity does not validate Moggi's laws nor η\eta. Moreover, there is no easy way to merge them. To better understand the situation, we provide an analysis of the rich range of possible call-by-value normal form bisimilarities, relating them to Ehrhard's relational model.Comment: Rewritten version (deleted toy similarity and explained proof method on naive similarity) -- Submitted to POPL2

    Nominal Recursors as Epi-Recursors: Extended Technical Report

    Full text link
    We study nominal recursors from the literature on syntax with bindings and compare them with respect to expressiveness. The term "nominal" refers to the fact that these recursors operate on a syntax representation where the names of bound variables appear explicitly, as in nominal logic. We argue that nominal recursors can be viewed as epi-recursors, a concept that captures abstractly the distinction between the constructors on which one actually recurses, and other operators and properties that further underpin recursion.We develop an abstract framework for comparing epi-recursors and instantiate it to the existing nominal recursors, and also to several recursors obtained from them by cross-pollination. The resulted expressiveness hierarchies depend on how strictly we perform this comparison, and bring insight into the relative merits of different axiomatizations of syntax. We also apply our methodology to produce an expressiveness hierarchy of nominal corecursors, which are principles for defining functions targeting infinitary non-well-founded terms (which underlie lambda-calculus semantics concepts such as B\"ohm trees). Our results are validated with the Isabelle/HOL theorem prover

    From Double Pushout Grammars to Hypergraph Lambek Grammars With and Without Exponential Modality

    Full text link
    We study how to relate well-known hypergraph grammars based on the double pushout (DPO) approach and grammars over the hypergraph Lambek calculus HL (called HL-grammars). It turns out that DPO rules can be naturally encoded by types of HL using methods similar to those used by Kanazawa for multiplicative-exponential linear logic. In order to generalize his reasonings we extend the hypergraph Lambek calculus by adding the exponential modality, which results in a new calculus HMEL0; then we prove that any DPO grammar can be converted into an equivalent HMEL0-grammar. We also define the conjunctive Kleene star, which behaves similarly to this exponential modality, and establish a similar result. If we add neither the exponential modality nor the conjunctive Kleene star to HL, then we can still use the same encoding and show that any DPO grammar with a linear restriction on the length of derivations can be converted into an equivalent HL-grammar.Comment: In Proceedings TERMGRAPH 2022, arXiv:2303.1421
    • …
    corecore