5,967 research outputs found
An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for Stanford Dependencies
Stanford typed dependencies are a widely desired representation of natural
language sentences, but parsing is one of the major computational bottlenecks
in text analysis systems. In light of the evolving definition of the Stanford
dependencies and developments in statistical dependency parsing algorithms,
this paper revisits the question of Cer et al. (2010): what is the tradeoff
between accuracy and speed in obtaining Stanford dependencies in particular? We
also explore the effects of input representations on this tradeoff:
part-of-speech tags, the novel use of an alternative dependency representation
as input, and distributional representaions of words. We find that direct
dependency parsing is a more viable solution than it was found to be in the
past. An accompanying software release can be found at:
http://www.ark.cs.cmu.edu/TBSDComment: 13 pages, 2 figure
A Re-ranking Model for Dependency Parser with Recursive Convolutional Neural Network
In this work, we address the problem to model all the nodes (words or
phrases) in a dependency tree with the dense representations. We propose a
recursive convolutional neural network (RCNN) architecture to capture syntactic
and compositional-semantic representations of phrases and words in a dependency
tree. Different with the original recursive neural network, we introduce the
convolution and pooling layers, which can model a variety of compositions by
the feature maps and choose the most informative compositions by the pooling
layers. Based on RCNN, we use a discriminative model to re-rank a -best list
of candidate dependency parsing trees. The experiments show that RCNN is very
effective to improve the state-of-the-art dependency parsing on both English
and Chinese datasets
- …