3 research outputs found

    Planar Induced Subgraphs of Sparse Graphs

    Full text link
    We show that every graph has an induced pseudoforest of at least n−m/4.5n-m/4.5 vertices, an induced partial 2-tree of at least n−m/5n-m/5 vertices, and an induced planar subgraph of at least n−m/5.2174n-m/5.2174 vertices. These results are constructive, implying linear-time algorithms to find the respective induced subgraphs. We also show that the size of the largest KhK_h-minor-free graph in a given graph can sometimes be at most n−m/6+o(m)n-m/6+o(m).Comment: Accepted by Graph Drawing 2014. To appear in Journal of Graph Algorithms and Application

    From Finite Automata to Regular Expressions and Back--A Summary on Descriptional Complexity

    Full text link
    The equivalence of finite automata and regular expressions dates back to the seminal paper of Kleene on events in nerve nets and finite automata from 1956. In the present paper we tour a fragment of the literature and summarize results on upper and lower bounds on the conversion of finite automata to regular expressions and vice versa. We also briefly recall the known bounds for the removal of spontaneous transitions (epsilon-transitions) on non-epsilon-free nondeterministic devices. Moreover, we report on recent results on the average case descriptional complexity bounds for the conversion of regular expressions to finite automata and brand new developments on the state elimination algorithm that converts finite automata to regular expressions.Comment: In Proceedings AFL 2014, arXiv:1405.527
    corecore