A Quasi-Polynomial Time Partition Oracle for Graphs with an Excluded Minor

Motivated by the problem of testing planarity and related properties, we study the problem of designing efficient {\em partition oracles}. A {\em partition oracle} is a procedure that, given access to the incidence lists representation of a bounded-degree graph $G= (V,E)$ and a parameter \eps, when queried on a vertex $v\in V$, returns the part (subset of vertices) which $v$ belongs to in a partition of all graph vertices. The partition should be such that all parts are small, each part is connected, and if the graph has certain properties, the total number of edges between parts is at most \eps |V|. In this work we give a partition oracle for graphs with excluded minors whose query complexity is quasi-polynomial in 1/\eps, thus improving on the result of Hassidim et al. ({\em Proceedings of FOCS 2009}) who gave a partition oracle with query complexity exponential in 1/\eps. This improvement implies corresponding improvements in the complexity of testing planarity and other properties that are characterized by excluded minors as well as sublinear-time approximation algorithms that work under the promise that the graph has an excluded minor.Comment: 13 pages, 1 figur

Upward and Orthogonal Planarity are W[1]-hard Parameterized by Treewidth

Upward planarity testing and Rectilinear planarity testing are central problems in graph drawing. It is known that they are both NP-complete, but XP when parameterized by treewidth. In this paper we show that these two problems are W[1]-hard parameterized by treewidth, which answers open problems posed in two earlier papers. The key step in our proof is an analysis of the All-or-Nothing Flow problem, a generalization of which was used as an intermediate step in the NP-completeness proof for both planarity testing problems. We prove that the flow problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by treewidth on planar graphs, and that the existing chain of reductions to the planarity testing problems can be adapted without blowing up the treewidth. Our reductions also show that the known $n^{O(tw)}$-time algorithms cannot be improved to run in time $n^{o(tw)}$ unless ETH fails.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2023

Drawing Arrangement Graphs In Small Grids, Or How To Play Planarity

We describe a linear-time algorithm that finds a planar drawing of every graph of a simple line or pseudoline arrangement within a grid of area O(n^{7/6}). No known input causes our algorithm to use area \Omega(n^{1+\epsilon}) for any \epsilon>0; finding such an input would represent significant progress on the famous k-set problem from discrete geometry. Drawing line arrangement graphs is the main task in the Planarity puzzle.Comment: 12 pages, 8 figures. To appear at 21st Int. Symp. Graph Drawing, Bordeaux, 201

Exact Distance Oracles for Planar Graphs with Failing Vertices

We consider exact distance oracles for directed weighted planar graphs in the presence of failing vertices. Given a source vertex $u$, a target vertex $v$ and a set $X$ of $k$ failed vertices, such an oracle returns the length of a shortest $u$-to-$v$ path that avoids all vertices in $X$. We propose oracles that can handle any number $k$ of failures. More specifically, for a directed weighted planar graph with $n$ vertices, any constant $k$, and for any $q \in [1,\sqrt n]$, we propose an oracle of size $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{n^{k+3/2}}{q^{2k+1}})$ that answers queries in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(q)$ time. In particular, we show an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$-size, $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{n})$-query-time oracle for any constant $k$. This matches, up to polylogarithmic factors, the fastest failure-free distance oracles with nearly linear space. For single vertex failures ($k=1$), our $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{n^{5/2}}{q^3})$-size, $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(q)$-query-time oracle improves over the previously best known tradeoff of Baswana et al. [SODA 2012] by polynomial factors for $q = \Omega(n^t)$, $t \in (1/4,1/2]$. For multiple failures, no planarity exploiting results were previously known