39 research outputs found
Defective and Clustered Graph Colouring
Consider the following two ways to colour the vertices of a graph where the
requirement that adjacent vertices get distinct colours is relaxed. A colouring
has "defect" if each monochromatic component has maximum degree at most
. A colouring has "clustering" if each monochromatic component has at
most vertices. This paper surveys research on these types of colourings,
where the first priority is to minimise the number of colours, with small
defect or small clustering as a secondary goal. List colouring variants are
also considered. The following graph classes are studied: outerplanar graphs,
planar graphs, graphs embeddable in surfaces, graphs with given maximum degree,
graphs with given maximum average degree, graphs excluding a given subgraph,
graphs with linear crossing number, linklessly or knotlessly embeddable graphs,
graphs with given Colin de Verdi\`ere parameter, graphs with given
circumference, graphs excluding a fixed graph as an immersion, graphs with
given thickness, graphs with given stack- or queue-number, graphs excluding
as a minor, graphs excluding as a minor, and graphs excluding
an arbitrary graph as a minor. Several open problems are discussed.Comment: This is a preliminary version of a dynamic survey to be published in
the Electronic Journal of Combinatoric
Defective and Clustered Choosability of Sparse Graphs
An (improper) graph colouring has "defect" if each monochromatic subgraph
has maximum degree at most , and has "clustering" if each monochromatic
component has at most vertices. This paper studies defective and clustered
list-colourings for graphs with given maximum average degree. We prove that
every graph with maximum average degree less than is
-choosable with defect . This improves upon a similar result by Havet and
Sereni [J. Graph Theory, 2006]. For clustered choosability of graphs with
maximum average degree , no bound on the number of colours
was previously known. The above result with solves this problem. It
implies that every graph with maximum average degree is
-choosable with clustering 2. This extends a
result of Kopreski and Yu [Discrete Math., 2017] to the setting of
choosability. We then prove two results about clustered choosability that
explore the trade-off between the number of colours and the clustering. In
particular, we prove that every graph with maximum average degree is
-choosable with clustering , and is
-choosable with clustering . As an
example, the later result implies that every biplanar graph is 8-choosable with
bounded clustering. This is the best known result for the clustered version of
the earth-moon problem. The results extend to the setting where we only
consider the maximum average degree of subgraphs with at least some number of
vertices. Several applications are presented
Near-colorings: non-colorable graphs and NP-completeness
A graph G is (d_1,..,d_l)-colorable if the vertex set of G can be partitioned
into subsets V_1,..,V_l such that the graph G[V_i] induced by the vertices of
V_i has maximum degree at most d_i for all 1 <= i <= l. In this paper, we focus
on complexity aspects of such colorings when l=2,3. More precisely, we prove
that, for any fixed integers k,j,g with (k,j) distinct form (0,0) and g >= 3,
either every planar graph with girth at least g is (k,j)-colorable or it is
NP-complete to determine whether a planar graph with girth at least g is
(k,j)-colorable. Also, for any fixed integer k, it is NP-complete to determine
whether a planar graph that is either (0,0,0)-colorable or
non-(k,k,1)-colorable is (0,0,0)-colorable. Additionally, we exhibit
non-(3,1)-colorable planar graphs with girth 5 and non-(2,0)-colorable planar
graphs with girth 7
On Two problems of defective choosability
Given positive integers , and a non-negative integer , we say a
graph is -choosable if for every list assignment with
for each and ,
there exists an -coloring of such that each monochromatic subgraph has
maximum degree at most . In particular, -choosable means
-colorable, -choosable means -choosable and
-choosable means -defective -choosable. This paper proves
that there are 1-defective 3-choosable graphs that are not 4-choosable, and for
any positive integers , and non-negative integer , there
are -choosable graphs that are not -choosable.
These results answer questions asked by Wang and Xu [SIAM J. Discrete Math. 27,
4(2013), 2020-2037], and Kang [J. Graph Theory 73, 3(2013), 342-353],
respectively. Our construction of -choosable but not -choosable graphs generalizes the construction of Kr\'{a}l' and Sgall
in [J. Graph Theory 49, 3(2005), 177-186] for the case .Comment: 12 pages, 4 figure