Immigrants, Employment, and Labor Unions: Nashville—Prospects for Coalition

immigration, employment, labor unions, Nashville

Business License Revocation: Is This What the Tennessee Economy Needs?

immigration, Tennessee, law, economy, labor

Immigration: An Opinion

immigration, U.S., opinion

Toward Improving Canada's Skilled Immigration Policy: An Evaluation Approach

Economic Growth and innovation, Canada, immigration, skilled immigration, point system

U.S. Immigration: A Historical Perspective

immigration, U.S., history

“Immigrationomics”: A Discussion of Some Key Issues

immigration, U.S., labor

Immigrants, Education, and Labor Market: A Perspective from Four States

immigration, education, labor market, workforce, population, Tennessee

Permanent Legal Immigration to the United States: Policy Overview

Four major principles currently underlie U.S. policy on legal permanent immigration: the reunification of families, the admission of immigrants with needed skills, the protection of refugees, and the diversity of admissions by country of origin. These principles are embodied in federal law, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) first codified in 1952. The Immigration Amendments of 1965 replaced the national origins quota system (enacted after World War I) with per-country ceilings, and the statutory provisions regulating permanent immigration to the United States were last revised significantly by the Immigration Act of 1990. The critiques of the permanent legal immigration system today are extensive, but there is no consensus on the specific direction the reforms of the law should take. As the Congress considers comprehensive immigration reform (CIR), many maintain that revision of the legal immigration system should be one of the major components of a CIR proposal. This primer on legal permanent immigration law, policies, and trends provides a backdrop for the policy options and debates that may emerge as Congress considers a revision of the legal immigration system

Immigration as Commerce: A New Look at the Federal Immigration Power and the Constitution

The relationship of immigration law to the Constitution has long been incoherent. One result is that there is little clarity on the appropriate standard of review for constitutional violations when aspects of immigration law and policy are challenged in the federal courts. This Article advances the Commerce Clause as the anchor of a new understanding of the link between the government\u27s immigration power and the Constitution. Despite the extensive early history of the Foreign Commerce Clause as the presumed source of the immigration power, it plays almost no role in immigration jurisprudence today, and few scholars have seriously considered its suitability for that role. More strikingly, none have explored the Interstate Commerce Clause as an appropriate source of the immigration power, one that could open the door to a normalization of constitutional analysis in the immigration context. The Article argues that both the Foreign and the Interstate Commerce Clauses should be understood to undergird the contemporary immigration power, and suggests that acknowledging immigration’s relationship to the Commerce Clause clears a path to more routine constitutional review of immigration law and policy