115 research outputs found

    A note on circular chromatic number of graphs with large girth and similar problems

    Full text link
    In this short note, we extend the result of Galluccio, Goddyn, and Hell, which states that graphs of large girth excluding a minor are nearly bipartite. We also prove a similar result for the oriented chromatic number, from which follows in particular that graphs of large girth excluding a minor have oriented chromatic number at most 55, and for the ppth chromatic number χp\chi_p, from which follows in particular that graphs GG of large girth excluding a minor have χp(G)≤p+2\chi_p(G)\leq p+2

    On (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic numbers of graphs having bounded sparsity parameters

    Full text link
    An (n,m)(n,m)-graph is characterised by having nn types of arcs and mm types of edges. A homomorphism of an (n,m)(n,m)-graph GG to an (n,m)(n,m)-graph HH, is a vertex mapping that preserves adjacency, direction, and type. The (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic number of GG, denoted by χn,m(G)\chi_{n,m}(G), is the minimum value of ∣V(H)∣|V(H)| such that there exists a homomorphism of GG to HH. The theory of homomorphisms of (n,m)(n,m)-graphs have connections with graph theoretic concepts like harmonious coloring, nowhere-zero flows; with other mathematical topics like binary predicate logic, Coxeter groups; and has application to the Query Evaluation Problem (QEP) in graph database. In this article, we show that the arboricity of GG is bounded by a function of χn,m(G)\chi_{n,m}(G) but not the other way around. Additionally, we show that the acyclic chromatic number of GG is bounded by a function of χn,m(G)\chi_{n,m}(G), a result already known in the reverse direction. Furthermore, we prove that the (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic number for the family of graphs with a maximum average degree less than 2+24(2n+m)−12+ \frac{2}{4(2n+m)-1}, including the subfamily of planar graphs with girth at least 8(2n+m)8(2n+m), equals 2(2n+m)+12(2n+m)+1. This improves upon previous findings, which proved the (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic number for planar graphs with girth at least 10(2n+m)−410(2n+m)-4 is 2(2n+m)+12(2n+m)+1. It is established that the (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic number for the family T2\mathcal{T}_2 of partial 22-trees is both bounded below and above by quadratic functions of (2n+m)(2n+m), with the lower bound being tight when (2n+m)=2(2n+m)=2. We prove 14≤χ(0,3)(T2)≤1514 \leq \chi_{(0,3)}(\mathcal{T}_2) \leq 15 and 14≤χ(1,1)(T2)≤2114 \leq \chi_{(1,1)}(\mathcal{T}_2) \leq 21 which improves both known lower bounds and the former upper bound. Moreover, for the latter upper bound, to the best of our knowledge we provide the first theoretical proof.Comment: 18 page

    Pushable chromatic number of graphs with degree constraints

    Get PDF
    Pushable homomorphisms and the pushable chromatic number χp\chi_p of oriented graphs were introduced by Klostermeyer and MacGillivray in 2004. They notably observed that, for any oriented graph G→\overrightarrow{G}, we have χp(G→)≤χo(G→)≤2χp(G→)\chi_p(\overrightarrow{G}) \leq \chi_o(\overrightarrow{G}) \leq 2 \chi_p(\overrightarrow{G}), where χo(G→)\chi_o(\overrightarrow{G}) denotes the oriented chromatic number of G→\overrightarrow{G}. This stands as first general bounds on χp\chi_p. This parameter was further studied in later works.This work is dedicated to the pushable chromatic number of oriented graphs fulfilling particular degree conditions. For all Δ≥29\Delta \geq 29, we first prove that the maximum value of the pushable chromatic number of an oriented graph with maximum degree Δ\Delta lies between 2Δ2−12^{\frac{\Delta}{2}-1} and (Δ−3)⋅(Δ−1)⋅2Δ−1+2(\Delta-3) \cdot (\Delta-1) \cdot 2^{\Delta-1} + 2 which implies an improved bound on the oriented chromatic number of the same family of graphs. For subcubic oriented graphs, that is, when Δ≤3\Delta \leq 3, we then prove that the maximum value of the pushable chromatic number is~66 or~77. We also prove that the maximum value of the pushable chromatic number of oriented graphs with maximum average degree less than~33 lies between~55 and~66. The former upper bound of~77 also holds as an upper bound on the pushable chromatic number of planar oriented graphs with girth at least~66

    Complexity of planar signed graph homomorphisms to cycles

    Full text link
    We study homomorphism problems of signed graphs. A signed graph is an undirected graph where each edge is given a sign, positive or negative. An important concept for signed graphs is the operation of switching at a vertex, which is to change the sign of each incident edge. A homomorphism of a graph is a vertex-mapping that preserves the adjacencies; in the case of signed graphs, we also preserve the edge-signs. Special homomorphisms of signed graphs, called s-homomorphisms, have been studied. In an s-homomorphism, we allow, before the mapping, to perform any number of switchings on the source signed graph. This concept has been extensively studied, and a full complexity classification (polynomial or NP-complete) for s-homomorphism to a fixed target signed graph has recently been obtained. Such a dichotomy is not known when we restrict the input graph to be planar (not even for non-signed graph homomorphisms). We show that deciding whether a (non-signed) planar graph admits a homomorphism to the square Ct2C_t^2 of a cycle with t≥6t\ge 6, or to the circular clique K4t/(2t−1)K_{4t/(2t-1)} with t≥2t\ge2, are NP-complete problems. We use these results to show that deciding whether a planar signed graph admits an s-homomorphism to an unbalanced even cycle is NP-complete. (A cycle is unbalanced if it has an odd number of negative edges). We deduce a complete complexity dichotomy for the planar s-homomorphism problem with any signed cycle as a target. We also study further restrictions involving the maximum degree and the girth of the input signed graph. We prove that planar s-homomorphism problems to signed cycles remain NP-complete even for inputs of maximum degree~33 (except for the case of unbalanced 44-cycles, for which we show this for maximum degree~44). We also show that for a given integer gg, the problem for signed bipartite planar inputs of girth gg is either trivial or NP-complete.Comment: 17 pages, 10 figure
    • …
    corecore