Limits on Fundamental Limits to Computation

An indispensable part of our lives, computing has also become essential to industries and governments. Steady improvements in computer hardware have been supported by periodic doubling of transistor densities in integrated circuits over the last fifty years. Such Moore scaling now requires increasingly heroic efforts, stimulating research in alternative hardware and stirring controversy. To help evaluate emerging technologies and enrich our understanding of integrated-circuit scaling, we review fundamental limits to computation: in manufacturing, energy, physical space, design and verification effort, and algorithms. To outline what is achievable in principle and in practice, we recall how some limits were circumvented, compare loose and tight limits. We also point out that engineering difficulties encountered by emerging technologies may indicate yet-unknown limits.Comment: 15 pages, 4 figures, 1 tabl

Hierarchical Whitespace Allocation in Top-down Placement

Increased transistor density in modern commercial ICs typically originates in new manufacturing and defect prevention technologies [13, 14]. Additionally, better utilization of such low-level transistor density may result from improved software that makes fewer assumptions about physical layout in order to reliably automate the design process. We observe that existing block- and chip-level layout instances can have considerable amounts of whitespace -- i.e., deliberately unused, costly layout area -- in order to reliably produce high-quality automatic layout solutions. Indeed, modern designs typically have from several percent up to 20% or more whitespace [5]. Whitespace can be the result of several phenomena, including pin-limited designs, limits of power distribution/dissipation density, and the need to maintain autoroutability. The first two of these phenomena are intrinsic to the design; the third is the result of limits in the place-and-route tools. A fourth cause of whitespace, ..

Interconnect Planning for Physical Design of 3D Integrated Circuits

Vertical stacking—based on modern manufacturing and integration technologies—of multiple 2D chips enables three-dimensional integrated circuits (3D ICs). This exploitation of the third dimension is generally accepted for aiming at higher packing densities, heterogeneous integration, shorter interconnects, reduced power consumption, increased data bandwidth, and realizing highly-parallel systems in one device. However, the commercial acceptance of 3D ICs is currently behind its expectations, mainly due to challenges regarding manufacturing and integration technologies as well as design automation. This work addresses three selected, practically relevant design challenges: (i) increasing the constrained reusability of proven, reliable 2D intellectual property blocks, (ii) planning different types of (comparatively large) through-silicon vias with focus on their impact on design quality, as well as (iii) structural planning of massively-parallel, 3D-IC-specific interconnect structures during 3D floorplanning. A key concept of this work is to account for interconnect structures and their properties during early design phases in order to support effective and high-quality 3D-IC-design flows. To tackle the above listed challenges, modular design-flow extensions and methodologies have been developed. Experimental investigations reveal the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed techniques, and provide findings on 3D integration with particular focus on interconnect structures. We suggest consideration of these findings when formulating guidelines for successful 3D-IC design automation.:1 Introduction 1.1 The 3D Integration Approach for Electronic Circuits 1.2 Technologies for 3D Integrated Circuits 1.3 Design Approaches for 3D Integrated Circuits 2 State of the Art in Design Automation for 3D Integrated Circuits 2.1 Thermal Management 2.2 Partitioning and Floorplanning 2.3 Placement and Routing 2.4 Power and Clock Delivery 2.5 Design Challenges 3 Research Objectives 4 Planning Through-Silicon Via Islands for Block-Level Design Reuse 4.1 Problems for Design Reuse in 3D Integrated Circuits 4.2 Connecting Blocks Using Through-Silicon Via Islands 4.2.1 Problem Formulation and Methodology Overview 4.2.2 Net Clustering 4.2.3 Insertion of Through-Silicon Via Islands 4.2.4 Deadspace Insertion and Redistribution 4.3 Experimental Investigation 4.3.1 Wirelength Estimation 4.3.2 Configuration 4.3.3 Results and Discussion 4.4 Summary and Conclusions 5 Planning Through-Silicon Vias for Design Optimization 5.1 Deadspace Requirements for Optimized Planning of Through-Silicon Vias 5.2 Multiobjective Design Optimization of 3D Integrated Circuits 5.2.1 Methodology Overview and Configuration 5.2.2 Techniques for Deadspace Optimization 5.2.3 Design-Quality Analysis 5.2.4 Planning Different Types of Through-Silicon Vias 5.3 Experimental Investigation 5.3.1 Configuration 5.3.2 Results and Discussion 5.4 Summary and Conclusions 6 3D Floorplanning for Structural Planning of Massive Interconnects 6.1 Block Alignment for Interconnects Planning in 3D Integrated Circuits 6.2 Corner Block List Extended for Block Alignment 6.2.1 Alignment Encoding 6.2.2 Layout Generation: Block Placement and Alignment 6.3 3D Floorplanning Methodology 6.3.1 Optimization Criteria and Phases and Related Cost Models 6.3.2 Fast Thermal Analysis 6.3.3 Layout Operations 6.3.4 Adaptive Optimization Schedule 6.4 Experimental Investigation 6.4.1 Configuration 6.4.2 Results and Discussion 6.5 Summary and Conclusions 7 Research Summary, Conclusions, and Outlook Dissertation Theses Notation Glossary BibliographyDreidimensional integrierte Schaltkreise (3D-ICs) beruhen auf neuartigen Herstellungs- und Integrationstechnologien, wobei vor allem “klassische” 2D-ICs vertikal zu einem neuartigen 3D-System gestapelt werden. Dieser Ansatz zur Erschließung der dritten Dimension im Schaltkreisentwurf ist nach Expertenmeinung dazu geeignet, höhere Integrationsdichten zu erreichen, heterogene Integration zu realisieren, kürzere Verdrahtungswege zu ermöglichen, Leistungsaufnahmen zu reduzieren, Datenübertragungsraten zu erhöhen, sowie hoch-parallele Systeme in einer Baugruppe umzusetzen. Aufgrund von technologischen und entwurfsmethodischen Schwierigkeiten bleibt jedoch bisher die kommerzielle Anwendung von 3D-ICs deutlich hinter den Erwartungen zurück. In dieser Arbeit werden drei ausgewählte, praktisch relevante Problemstellungen der Entwurfsautomatisierung von 3D-ICs bearbeitet: (i) die Verbesserung der (eingeschränkten) Wiederverwendbarkeit von zuverlässigen 2D-Intellectual-Property-Blöcken, (ii) die komplexe Planung von verschiedenartigen, verhältnismäßig großen Through-Silicion Vias unter Beachtung ihres Einflusses auf die Entwurfsqualität, und (iii) die strukturelle Einbindung von massiv-parallelen, 3D-IC-spezifischen Verbindungsstrukturen während der Floorplanning-Phase. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit besteht darin, Verbindungsstrukturen mit deren wesentlichen Eigenschaften bereits in den frühen Phasen des Entwurfsprozesses zu berücksichtigen. Dies begünstigt einen qualitativ hochwertigen Entwurf von 3D-ICs. Die in dieser Arbeit vorgestellten modularen Entwurfsprozess-Erweiterungen bzw. -Methodiken dienen zur effizienten Lösung der oben genannten Problemstellungen. Experimentelle Untersuchungen bestätigen die Wirksamkeit sowie die Effektivität der erarbeiten Methoden. Darüber hinaus liefern sie praktische Erkenntnisse bezüglich der Anwendung von 3D-ICs und der Planung deren Verbindungsstrukturen. Diese Erkenntnisse sind zur Ableitung von Richtlinien für den erfolgreichen Entwurf von 3D-ICs dienlich.:1 Introduction 1.1 The 3D Integration Approach for Electronic Circuits 1.2 Technologies for 3D Integrated Circuits 1.3 Design Approaches for 3D Integrated Circuits 2 State of the Art in Design Automation for 3D Integrated Circuits 2.1 Thermal Management 2.2 Partitioning and Floorplanning 2.3 Placement and Routing 2.4 Power and Clock Delivery 2.5 Design Challenges 3 Research Objectives 4 Planning Through-Silicon Via Islands for Block-Level Design Reuse 4.1 Problems for Design Reuse in 3D Integrated Circuits 4.2 Connecting Blocks Using Through-Silicon Via Islands 4.2.1 Problem Formulation and Methodology Overview 4.2.2 Net Clustering 4.2.3 Insertion of Through-Silicon Via Islands 4.2.4 Deadspace Insertion and Redistribution 4.3 Experimental Investigation 4.3.1 Wirelength Estimation 4.3.2 Configuration 4.3.3 Results and Discussion 4.4 Summary and Conclusions 5 Planning Through-Silicon Vias for Design Optimization 5.1 Deadspace Requirements for Optimized Planning of Through-Silicon Vias 5.2 Multiobjective Design Optimization of 3D Integrated Circuits 5.2.1 Methodology Overview and Configuration 5.2.2 Techniques for Deadspace Optimization 5.2.3 Design-Quality Analysis 5.2.4 Planning Different Types of Through-Silicon Vias 5.3 Experimental Investigation 5.3.1 Configuration 5.3.2 Results and Discussion 5.4 Summary and Conclusions 6 3D Floorplanning for Structural Planning of Massive Interconnects 6.1 Block Alignment for Interconnects Planning in 3D Integrated Circuits 6.2 Corner Block List Extended for Block Alignment 6.2.1 Alignment Encoding 6.2.2 Layout Generation: Block Placement and Alignment 6.3 3D Floorplanning Methodology 6.3.1 Optimization Criteria and Phases and Related Cost Models 6.3.2 Fast Thermal Analysis 6.3.3 Layout Operations 6.3.4 Adaptive Optimization Schedule 6.4 Experimental Investigation 6.4.1 Configuration 6.4.2 Results and Discussion 6.5 Summary and Conclusions 7 Research Summary, Conclusions, and Outlook Dissertation Theses Notation Glossary Bibliograph

High-Performance Placement and Routing for the Nanometer Scale.

Modern semiconductor manufacturing facilitates single-chip electronic systems that only five years ago required ten to twenty chips. Naturally, design complexity has grown within this period. In contrast to this growth, it is becoming common in the industry to limit design team size which places a heavier burden on design automation tools. Our work identifies new objectives, constraints and concerns in the physical design of systems-on-chip, and develops new computational techniques to address them. In addition to faster and more relevant design optimizations, we demonstrate that traditional design flows based on ``separation of concerns'' produce unnecessarily suboptimal layouts. We develop new integrated optimizations that streamline traditional chains of loosely-linked design tools. In particular, we bridge the gap between mixed-size placement and routing by updating the objective of global and detail placement to a more accurate estimate of routed wirelength. To this we add sophisticated whitespace allocation, and the combination provides increased routability, faster routing, shorter routed wirelength, and the best via counts of published techniques. To further improve post-routing design metrics, we present new global routing techniques based on Discrete Lagrange Multipliers (DLM) which produce the best routed wirelength results on recent benchmarks. Our work culminates in the integration of our routing techniques within an incremental placement flow to improve detailed routing solutions, shrink die sizes and reduce total chip cost. Not only do our techniques improve the quality and cost of designs, but also simplify design automation software implementation in many cases. Ultimately, we reduce the time needed for design closure through improved tool fidelity and the use of our incremental techniques for placement and routing.Ph.D.Computer Science & EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64639/1/royj_1.pd