8,246 research outputs found
Construction and Verification of Performance and Reliability Models
Over the last two decades formal methods have been extended towards performance and reliability evaluation. This paper tries to provide a rather intuitive explanation of the basic concepts and features in this area.
Instead of striving for mathematical rigour, the intention is to give an illustrative introduction to the basics of stochastic models, to stochastic modelling using process algebra, and to model checking as a technique to analyse stochastic models
Model Checking Classes of Metric LTL Properties of Object-Oriented Real-Time Maude Specifications
This paper presents a transformational approach for model checking two
important classes of metric temporal logic (MTL) properties, namely, bounded
response and minimum separation, for nonhierarchical object-oriented Real-Time
Maude specifications. We prove the correctness of our model checking
algorithms, which terminate under reasonable non-Zeno-ness assumptions when the
reachable state space is finite. These new model checking features have been
integrated into Real-Time Maude, and are used to analyze a network of medical
devices and a 4-way traffic intersection system.Comment: In Proceedings RTRTS 2010, arXiv:1009.398
PDDL2.1: An extension of PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains
In recent years research in the planning community has moved increasingly towards application of planners to realistic problems involving both time and many types of resources. For example, interest in planning demonstrated by the space research community has inspired work in observation scheduling, planetary rover ex ploration and spacecraft control domains. Other temporal and resource-intensive domains including logistics planning, plant control and manufacturing have also helped to focus the community on the modelling and reasoning issues that must be confronted to make planning technology meet the challenges of application. The International Planning Competitions have acted as an important motivating force behind the progress that has been made in planning since 1998. The third competition (held in 2002) set the planning community the challenge of handling time and numeric resources. This necessitated the development of a modelling language capable of expressing temporal and numeric properties of planning domains. In this paper we describe the language, PDDL2.1, that was used in the competition. We describe the syntax of the language, its formal semantics and the validation of concurrent plans. We observe that PDDL2.1 has considerable modelling power --- exceeding the capabilities of current planning technology --- and presents a number of important challenges to the research community
Extending the Real-Time Maude Semantics of Ptolemy to Hierarchical DE Models
This paper extends our Real-Time Maude formalization of the semantics of flat
Ptolemy II discrete-event (DE) models to hierarchical models, including modal
models. This is a challenging task that requires combining synchronous
fixed-point computations with hierarchical structure. The synthesis of a
Real-Time Maude verification model from a Ptolemy II DE model, and the formal
verification of the synthesized model in Real-Time Maude, have been integrated
into Ptolemy II, enabling a model-engineering process that combines the
convenience of Ptolemy II DE modeling and simulation with formal verification
in Real-Time Maude.Comment: In Proceedings RTRTS 2010, arXiv:1009.398
BeSpaceD: Towards a Tool Framework and Methodology for the Specification and Verification of Spatial Behavior of Distributed Software Component Systems
In this report, we present work towards a framework for modeling and checking
behavior of spatially distributed component systems. Design goals of our
framework are the ability to model spatial behavior in a component oriented,
simple and intuitive way, the possibility to automatically analyse and verify
systems and integration possibilities with other modeling and verification
tools. We present examples and the verification steps necessary to prove
properties such as range coverage or the absence of collisions between
components and technical details
- ā¦