7 research outputs found
Scheduling MapReduce Jobs under Multi-Round Precedences
We consider non-preemptive scheduling of MapReduce jobs with multiple tasks
in the practical scenario where each job requires several map-reduce rounds. We
seek to minimize the average weighted completion time and consider scheduling
on identical and unrelated parallel processors. For identical processors, we
present LP-based O(1)-approximation algorithms. For unrelated processors, the
approximation ratio naturally depends on the maximum number of rounds of any
job. Since the number of rounds per job in typical MapReduce algorithms is a
small constant, our scheduling algorithms achieve a small approximation ratio
in practice. For the single-round case, we substantially improve on previously
best known approximation guarantees for both identical and unrelated
processors. Moreover, we conduct an experimental analysis and compare the
performance of our algorithms against a fast heuristic and a lower bound on the
optimal solution, thus demonstrating their promising practical performance
Hardness of Approximating Flow and Job Shop Scheduling Problems
We consider several variants of the job shop problem that is a fundamental and classical problem in scheduling. The currently best approximation algorithms have worse than logarithmic performance guarantee, but the only previously known inapproximability result says that it is NP-hard to approximate job shops within a factor less than 5/4. Closing this big approximability gap is a well-known and long-standing open problem