Information-Distilling Quantizers

Let $X$ and $Y$ be dependent random variables. This paper considers the problem of designing a scalar quantizer for $Y$ to maximize the mutual information between the quantizer's output and $X$, and develops fundamental properties and bounds for this form of quantization, which is connected to the log-loss distortion criterion. The main focus is the regime of low $I(X;Y)$, where it is shown that, if $X$ is binary, a constant fraction of the mutual information can always be preserved using $\mathcal{O}(\log(1/I(X;Y)))$ quantization levels, and there exist distributions for which this many quantization levels are necessary. Furthermore, for larger finite alphabets $2 < |\mathcal{X}| < \infty$, it is established that an $\eta$-fraction of the mutual information can be preserved using roughly $(\log(| \mathcal{X} | /I(X;Y)))^{\eta\cdot(|\mathcal{X}| - 1)}$ quantization levels

Bottleneck Problems: Information and Estimation-Theoretic View

Information bottleneck (IB) and privacy funnel (PF) are two closely related optimization problems which have found applications in machine learning, design of privacy algorithms, capacity problems (e.g., Mrs. Gerber's Lemma), strong data processing inequalities, among others. In this work, we first investigate the functional properties of IB and PF through a unified theoretical framework. We then connect them to three information-theoretic coding problems, namely hypothesis testing against independence, noisy source coding and dependence dilution. Leveraging these connections, we prove a new cardinality bound for the auxiliary variable in IB, making its computation more tractable for discrete random variables. In the second part, we introduce a general family of optimization problems, termed as \textit{bottleneck problems}, by replacing mutual information in IB and PF with other notions of mutual information, namely $f$-information and Arimoto's mutual information. We then argue that, unlike IB and PF, these problems lead to easily interpretable guarantee in a variety of inference tasks with statistical constraints on accuracy and privacy. Although the underlying optimization problems are non-convex, we develop a technique to evaluate bottleneck problems in closed form by equivalently expressing them in terms of lower convex or upper concave envelope of certain functions. By applying this technique to binary case, we derive closed form expressions for several bottleneck problems