9,460 research outputs found
Data-Driven Grasp Synthesis - A Survey
We review the work on data-driven grasp synthesis and the methodologies for
sampling and ranking candidate grasps. We divide the approaches into three
groups based on whether they synthesize grasps for known, familiar or unknown
objects. This structure allows us to identify common object representations and
perceptual processes that facilitate the employed data-driven grasp synthesis
technique. In the case of known objects, we concentrate on the approaches that
are based on object recognition and pose estimation. In the case of familiar
objects, the techniques use some form of a similarity matching to a set of
previously encountered objects. Finally for the approaches dealing with unknown
objects, the core part is the extraction of specific features that are
indicative of good grasps. Our survey provides an overview of the different
methodologies and discusses open problems in the area of robot grasping. We
also draw a parallel to the classical approaches that rely on analytic
formulations.Comment: 20 pages, 30 Figures, submitted to IEEE Transactions on Robotic
On Neuromechanical Approaches for the Study of Biological Grasp and Manipulation
Biological and robotic grasp and manipulation are undeniably similar at the
level of mechanical task performance. However, their underlying fundamental
biological vs. engineering mechanisms are, by definition, dramatically
different and can even be antithetical. Even our approach to each is
diametrically opposite: inductive science for the study of biological systems
vs. engineering synthesis for the design and construction of robotic systems.
The past 20 years have seen several conceptual advances in both fields and the
quest to unify them. Chief among them is the reluctant recognition that their
underlying fundamental mechanisms may actually share limited common ground,
while exhibiting many fundamental differences. This recognition is particularly
liberating because it allows us to resolve and move beyond multiple paradoxes
and contradictions that arose from the initial reasonable assumption of a large
common ground. Here, we begin by introducing the perspective of neuromechanics,
which emphasizes that real-world behavior emerges from the intimate
interactions among the physical structure of the system, the mechanical
requirements of a task, the feasible neural control actions to produce it, and
the ability of the neuromuscular system to adapt through interactions with the
environment. This allows us to articulate a succinct overview of a few salient
conceptual paradoxes and contradictions regarding under-determined vs.
over-determined mechanics, under- vs. over-actuated control, prescribed vs.
emergent function, learning vs. implementation vs. adaptation, prescriptive vs.
descriptive synergies, and optimal vs. habitual performance. We conclude by
presenting open questions and suggesting directions for future research. We
hope this frank assessment of the state-of-the-art will encourage and guide
these communities to continue to interact and make progress in these important
areas
More Than a Feeling: Learning to Grasp and Regrasp using Vision and Touch
For humans, the process of grasping an object relies heavily on rich tactile
feedback. Most recent robotic grasping work, however, has been based only on
visual input, and thus cannot easily benefit from feedback after initiating
contact. In this paper, we investigate how a robot can learn to use tactile
information to iteratively and efficiently adjust its grasp. To this end, we
propose an end-to-end action-conditional model that learns regrasping policies
from raw visuo-tactile data. This model -- a deep, multimodal convolutional
network -- predicts the outcome of a candidate grasp adjustment, and then
executes a grasp by iteratively selecting the most promising actions. Our
approach requires neither calibration of the tactile sensors, nor any
analytical modeling of contact forces, thus reducing the engineering effort
required to obtain efficient grasping policies. We train our model with data
from about 6,450 grasping trials on a two-finger gripper equipped with GelSight
high-resolution tactile sensors on each finger. Across extensive experiments,
our approach outperforms a variety of baselines at (i) estimating grasp
adjustment outcomes, (ii) selecting efficient grasp adjustments for quick
grasping, and (iii) reducing the amount of force applied at the fingers, while
maintaining competitive performance. Finally, we study the choices made by our
model and show that it has successfully acquired useful and interpretable
grasping behaviors.Comment: 8 pages. Published on IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (RAL).
Website: https://sites.google.com/view/more-than-a-feelin
- …