Geometry-aware Deep Transform

Many recent efforts have been devoted to designing sophisticated deep learning structures, obtaining revolutionary results on benchmark datasets. The success of these deep learning methods mostly relies on an enormous volume of labeled training samples to learn a huge number of parameters in a network; therefore, understanding the generalization ability of a learned deep network cannot be overlooked, especially when restricted to a small training set, which is the case for many applications. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning objective formulation that unifies both the classification and metric learning criteria. We then introduce a geometry-aware deep transform to enable a non-linear discriminative and robust feature transform, which shows competitive performance on small training sets for both synthetic and real-world data. We further support the proposed framework with a formal $(K,\epsilon)$-robustness analysis.Comment: to appear in ICCV2015, updated with minor revisio

Deep Neural Networks with Random Gaussian Weights: A Universal Classification Strategy?

Three important properties of a classification machinery are: (i) the system preserves the core information of the input data; (ii) the training examples convey information about unseen data; and (iii) the system is able to treat differently points from different classes. In this work we show that these fundamental properties are satisfied by the architecture of deep neural networks. We formally prove that these networks with random Gaussian weights perform a distance-preserving embedding of the data, with a special treatment for in-class and out-of-class data. Similar points at the input of the network are likely to have a similar output. The theoretical analysis of deep networks here presented exploits tools used in the compressed sensing and dictionary learning literature, thereby making a formal connection between these important topics. The derived results allow drawing conclusions on the metric learning properties of the network and their relation to its structure, as well as providing bounds on the required size of the training set such that the training examples would represent faithfully the unseen data. The results are validated with state-of-the-art trained networks.Comment: 14 pages, 13 figure