3,511 research outputs found

    Ramsey numbers of ordered graphs

    Full text link
    An ordered graph is a pair G=(G,)\mathcal{G}=(G,\prec) where GG is a graph and \prec is a total ordering of its vertices. The ordered Ramsey number R(G)\overline{R}(\mathcal{G}) is the minimum number NN such that every ordered complete graph with NN vertices and with edges colored by two colors contains a monochromatic copy of G\mathcal{G}. In contrast with the case of unordered graphs, we show that there are arbitrarily large ordered matchings Mn\mathcal{M}_n on nn vertices for which R(Mn)\overline{R}(\mathcal{M}_n) is superpolynomial in nn. This implies that ordered Ramsey numbers of the same graph can grow superpolynomially in the size of the graph in one ordering and remain linear in another ordering. We also prove that the ordered Ramsey number R(G)\overline{R}(\mathcal{G}) is polynomial in the number of vertices of G\mathcal{G} if the bandwidth of G\mathcal{G} is constant or if G\mathcal{G} is an ordered graph of constant degeneracy and constant interval chromatic number. The first result gives a positive answer to a question of Conlon, Fox, Lee, and Sudakov. For a few special classes of ordered paths, stars or matchings, we give asymptotically tight bounds on their ordered Ramsey numbers. For so-called monotone cycles we compute their ordered Ramsey numbers exactly. This result implies exact formulas for geometric Ramsey numbers of cycles introduced by K\'arolyi, Pach, T\'oth, and Valtr.Comment: 29 pages, 13 figures, to appear in Electronic Journal of Combinatoric

    The history of degenerate (bipartite) extremal graph problems

    Full text link
    This paper is a survey on Extremal Graph Theory, primarily focusing on the case when one of the excluded graphs is bipartite. On one hand we give an introduction to this field and also describe many important results, methods, problems, and constructions.Comment: 97 pages, 11 figures, many problems. This is the preliminary version of our survey presented in Erdos 100. In this version 2 only a citation was complete

    Induced Ramsey-type results and binary predicates for point sets

    Full text link
    Let kk and pp be positive integers and let QQ be a finite point set in general position in the plane. We say that QQ is (k,p)(k,p)-Ramsey if there is a finite point set PP such that for every kk-coloring cc of (Pp)\binom{P}{p} there is a subset QQ' of PP such that QQ' and QQ have the same order type and (Qp)\binom{Q'}{p} is monochromatic in cc. Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il and Valtr proved that for every kNk \in \mathbb{N}, all point sets are (k,1)(k,1)-Ramsey. They also proved that for every k2k \ge 2 and p2p \ge 2, there are point sets that are not (k,p)(k,p)-Ramsey. As our main result, we introduce a new family of (k,2)(k,2)-Ramsey point sets, extending a result of Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il and Valtr. We then use this new result to show that for every kk there is a point set PP such that no function Γ\Gamma that maps ordered pairs of distinct points from PP to a set of size kk can satisfy the following "local consistency" property: if Γ\Gamma attains the same values on two ordered triples of points from PP, then these triples have the same orientation. Intuitively, this implies that there cannot be such a function that is defined locally and determines the orientation of point triples.Comment: 22 pages, 3 figures, final version, minor correction

    Embedding large subgraphs into dense graphs

    Full text link
    What conditions ensure that a graph G contains some given spanning subgraph H? The most famous examples of results of this kind are probably Dirac's theorem on Hamilton cycles and Tutte's theorem on perfect matchings. Perfect matchings are generalized by perfect F-packings, where instead of covering all the vertices of G by disjoint edges, we want to cover G by disjoint copies of a (small) graph F. It is unlikely that there is a characterization of all graphs G which contain a perfect F-packing, so as in the case of Dirac's theorem it makes sense to study conditions on the minimum degree of G which guarantee a perfect F-packing. The Regularity lemma of Szemeredi and the Blow-up lemma of Komlos, Sarkozy and Szemeredi have proved to be powerful tools in attacking such problems and quite recently, several long-standing problems and conjectures in the area have been solved using these. In this survey, we give an outline of recent progress (with our main emphasis on F-packings, Hamiltonicity problems and tree embeddings) and describe some of the methods involved

    On the Spectrum of Wenger Graphs

    Full text link
    Let q=peq=p^e, where pp is a prime and e1e\geq 1 is an integer. For m1m\geq 1, let PP and LL be two copies of the (m+1)(m+1)-dimensional vector spaces over the finite field Fq\mathbb{F}_q. Consider the bipartite graph Wm(q)W_m(q) with partite sets PP and LL defined as follows: a point (p)=(p1,p2,,pm+1)P(p)=(p_1,p_2,\ldots,p_{m+1})\in P is adjacent to a line [l]=[l1,l2,,lm+1]L[l]=[l_1,l_2,\ldots,l_{m+1}]\in L if and only if the following mm equalities hold: li+1+pi+1=lip1l_{i+1} + p_{i+1}=l_{i}p_1 for i=1,,mi=1,\ldots, m. We call the graphs Wm(q)W_m(q) Wenger graphs. In this paper, we determine all distinct eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of Wm(q)W_m(q) and their multiplicities. We also survey results on Wenger graphs.Comment: 9 pages; accepted for publication to J. Combin. Theory, Series
    corecore