2,371 research outputs found
Agent-Based Models and Simulations in Economics and Social Sciences: from conceptual exploration to distinct ways of experimenting
Now that complex Agent-Based Models and computer simulations
spread over economics and social sciences - as in most sciences of complex
systems -, epistemological puzzles (re)emerge. We introduce new
epistemological tools so as to show to what precise extent each author is right
when he focuses on some empirical, instrumental or conceptual significance of
his model or simulation. By distinguishing between models and simulations,
between types of models, between types of computer simulations and between
types of empiricity, section 2 gives conceptual tools to explain the rationale of
the diverse epistemological positions presented in section 1. Finally, we claim
that a careful attention to the real multiplicity of denotational powers of
symbols at stake and then to the implicit routes of references operated by
models and computer simulations is necessary to determine, in each case, the
proper epistemic status and credibility of a given model and/or simulation
External Validity: From Do-Calculus to Transportability Across Populations
The generalizability of empirical findings to new environments, settings or
populations, often called "external validity," is essential in most scientific
explorations. This paper treats a particular problem of generalizability,
called "transportability," defined as a license to transfer causal effects
learned in experimental studies to a new population, in which only
observational studies can be conducted. We introduce a formal representation
called "selection diagrams" for expressing knowledge about differences and
commonalities between populations of interest and, using this representation,
we reduce questions of transportability to symbolic derivations in the
do-calculus. This reduction yields graph-based procedures for deciding, prior
to observing any data, whether causal effects in the target population can be
inferred from experimental findings in the study population. When the answer is
affirmative, the procedures identify what experimental and observational
findings need be obtained from the two populations, and how they can be
combined to ensure bias-free transport.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/14-STS486 the Statistical
Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical
Statistics (http://www.imstat.org). arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1312.748
Agent-Based Models and Simulations in Economics and Social Sciences
Now that complex Agent-Based Models and computer simulations spread over economics and social sciences - as in most sciences of complex systems -, epistemological puzzles (re)emerge. We introduce new epistemological concepts so as to show to what extent authors are right when they focus on some empirical, instrumental or conceptual significance of their model or simulation. By distinguishing between models and simulations, between types of models, between types of computer simulations and between types of empiricity obtained through a simulation, section 2 gives the possibility to understand more precisely - and then to justify - the diversity of the epistemological positions presented in section 1. Our final claim is that careful attention to the multiplicity of the denotational powers of symbols at stake in complex models and computer simulations is necessary to determine, in each case, their proper epistemic status and credibility.Agent-Based Models and Simulations ; Epistemology ; Economics ; Social Sciences ; Conceptual Exploration ; Model World ; Credible World ; Experiment ; Denotational Hierarchy
On Bell's theorem, quantum communication, and entanglement detection
(A) Bell's theorem rests on a conjunction of three assumptions: realism,
locality and ``free will''. A discussion of these assumptions will be
presented.
It will be also shown that, if one adds to the assumptions the principle or
rotational symmetry of physical laws, a stronger version of the theorem
emerges. (B) A link between Bell's theorem and communication complexity
problems will be presented. This also includes experimental realizations, which
surprisingly do not involve entanglement. (C) A new sufficient and necessary
criterion for entanglement of general (mixed) states is be presented. It is
derived using the same geometric starting point as the inclusion of the
symmetry in (A). The set of entanglement identifiers (EI's) emerging via this
method contains entanglement witnesses (EW's), but they form only a subset of
all EI's. Thus the method is more powerful than the one based on EW's.Comment: 10 pages, for proceedings of Foundations of Probability and Physics-5
at Vaxjo University, Swedish Southeast Academy August 24-27, 200
On the methodology of management research
Epistemology, methodology or philosophy of science, i.e., the foundations and validity of knowledge, have never been very popular subjects as applied to management research. Lately, though, the need for better theories and the methodological discussion underlying the creation of such theories appears to be receiving more attention. In this paper, I will review some basic underlying issues in the area by taking a look at to some of the classical authors. I will first analyze Hayek's view of methodological problems in economics and then apply his analysis to the development of management theory. Then, I'll elaborate on Elster's distinction between causal, functional and intentional explanations. NaĂŻve methodological attitudes will be discussed in this context. I will use agency theory as an example of what should and should not be done. Finally, I'll examine the falsification criterion in management theory and discuss the role of mathematics in the development of theory.epistemology; philosophy of science; methodology; management theory; foundations of management;
A Pragmatic Interpretation of Quantum Logic
Scholars have wondered for a long time whether the language of quantum
mechanics introduces a quantum notion of truth which is formalized by quantum
logic (QL) and is incompatible with the classical (Tarskian) notion. We show
that QL can be interpreted as a pragmatic language of assertive formulas which
formalize statements about physical systems that are empirically justified or
unjustified in the framework of quantum mechanics. According to this
interpretation, QL formalizes properties of the metalinguistic notion of
empirical justification within quantum mechanics rather than properties of a
quantum notion of truth. This conclusion agrees with a general integrationist
perspective that interprets nonstandard logics as theories of metalinguistic
notions different from truth, thus avoiding incompatibility with classical
notions and preserving the globality of logic. By the way, some elucidations of
the standard notion of quantum truth are also obtained.
Key words: pragmatics, quantum logic, quantum mechanics, justifiability,
global pluralism.Comment: Third version: 20 pages. Sects. 1, 2, and 4 rewritten and improved.
Explanations adde
- …