General practice

The remarkable rate of development of medical knowledge and pharmacology affects all medical specialties and in particular general practice, since the latter embraces various aspects of different medical fields. Certain areas of medical practice, such as Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT), hypercholesterolaemia and drugs affecting the Renin Angiotensin System (RAS) feature in a vast amount of literature which is constantly being updated. The increasing awareness of the previously unknown effects of HRT on one side, and the widespread prevalence of cardiovascular disease in the case of hypercholesterolaemia and drugs affecting the RAS have contributed to this large amount of studies. On the other hand, certain areas of practice such as atopic eczema and anti-thrombotic therapy have been rather quiescent as far as developments are concerned, but revolutionary treatments have recently been introduced in both areas, namely the calcineurin antagonists and ximelagratan. The latter is a very promising drug which can replace warfarin, while the former are the first steroid-sparing medications which effectively control atopic eczema. Keeping abreast with recent developments is a further hurdle which the modern general practioner has to contend with in order to offer valid treatment options, and to be able to answer questions by increasingly well-informed patients.peer-reviewe

Emergency medicine and general practice

Emergency Medicine and Immediate Medical Care are relatively new specialties. In Malta, there is quite a considerable area of overlap between these specialties and general practice. Indeed, the family physician is confronted with some sort of medical emergency quite regularly. The brief of this article is to go through recent developments in Emergency Medicine as applied to General Practice. The areas considered are Basic Life Support, Head Injury, Asthma, Anaphylaxis, Community Acquired Pneumonia, Burns and Controlled Hypotensive Resuscitation. Whenever possible, distinct practical guidelines will be suggested as an aid in the clinical management of emergency situations which the family physician may encounter. This overview of new developments is by no means comprehensive but serves to highlight the increasing importance given to the role of the first-line medical practitioner in the emergency situation.peer-reviewe

Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations.

Objective: To investigate patients' agendas before consultation and to assess which aspects of agendas are voiced in the consultation and the effects of unvoiced agendas on outcomes. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: 20 general practices in south east England and the West Midlands. Participants: 35 patients consulting 20 general practitioners in appointment and emergency surgeries. Results: Patients' agendas are complex and multifarious. Only four of 35 patients voiced all their agendas in consultation. Agenda items most commonly voiced were symptoms and requests for diagnoses and prescriptions. The most common unvoiced agenda items were: worries about possible diagnosis and what the future holds; patients' ideas about what is wrong; side effects; not wanting a prescription; and information relating to social context. Agenda items that were not raised in the consultation often led to specific problem outcomes (for example, major misunderstandings), unwanted prescriptions, non-use of prescriptions, and non-adherence to treatment. In all of the 14 consultations with problem outcomes at least one of the problems was related to an unvoiced agenda item. Conclusion: Patients have many needs and when these are not voiced they can not be addressed. Some of the poor outcomes in the case studies were related to unvoiced agenda items. This suggests that when patients and their needs are more fully articulated in the consultation better health care may be effected. Steps should be taken in both daily clinical practice and research to encourage the voicing of patients' agenda

General practice organisation and healthcare reform : what do Maltese general practitioners think?

In Malta, two-thirds of primary healthcare is delivered by private general practitioners (GPs), mostly working single-handed without supporting staff. The combined lack of patient registration and transferable medical records lead to fragmentation of care, duplication of resources and suboptimal disease prevention and management. In 2009, the government proposed a reform to encourage partnerships which was shelved. The aim of this article is to explore the opinions of GPs about how practice organisation might influence them and their patients and to seek GPs’ views about possible healthcare reform initiatives. A postal cross-sectional survey of all specialists in family medicine resident in Malta. An instrument was designed, piloted and validated. SPSS® (v. 20) was used for analysis. One hundred and fifty (44%) questionnaires were returned. Respondents were representative of the sample as regards demographic and employment characteristics. Only 26% of GPs are female, but most work in partnerships or the public service. Seventy-seven per cent of private GPs work single-handed. Group practitioners are more likely to utilise electronic medical records and appointments, and to employ secretaries. Doctors acknowledge that although patients prefer one GP, partnerships can deliver better patient care. GPs believe that partnerships are beneficial for themselves, and would consider joining one. Females and young doctors favour partnerships. Respondents, particularly young doctors, favour patient registration and reform. Public doctors who work part-time privately oppose reform. Most GPs favour group practices and health reform, especially females and young doctors (whose proportions are increasing). Primary care should be urgently reformed and patient registration introduced. Public-private agreements would stimulate partnership formation. Public group practices could cater for means-tested citizens.peer-reviewe

Rhinitis in general practice

A 3 year old boy presented with a 3 week history of nasal obstruction, clear rhinorrhea, difficulty with feeding and a productive cough. Child was afebrile, had occasional watery itchy eyes and mother claimed that at night he tended to wake up a couple of times coughing and crying. He suffered from eczema as a baby. On examination he had clear rhinorrhoea, nasal mucosa appeared red, ear drums looked slightly pink, tonsils swollen yet normal colour, cervical lymph nodes absent.peer-reviewe

Monitoring osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional survey in general practice

<b>Background</b> Despite being a highly prevalent chronic condition managed predominantly in primary care and unlike other chronic conditions, osteoarthritis (OA) care is delivered on an ad hoc basis rather than through routine structured review. Evidence suggests current levels of OA care are suboptimal, but little is known about what general practitioners' (GPs) consider important in OA care, and, thus, the scope to improve inconsistency or poor practice is, at present, limited.<p></p> <b>Objectives</b> We investigated GPs' views on and practice of monitoring OA. <p></p> <b>Methods</b> This was a cross-sectional postal survey of 2500 practicing UK GPs randomly selected from the Binley's database. Respondents were asked if monitoring OA patients was important and how monitoring should be undertaken.<p></p> <b>Results</b> Responses were received from 768 GPs of whom 70.8% were male and 89.5% were principals within their practices. Despite 55.4% (n = 405) indicating monitoring patients with OA was important and 78.3% (n = 596) considering GPs the appropriate professionals to monitor OA, only 15.2% (n = 114) did so routinely, and 45% (n = 337) did not monitor any OA patients at all. In total, 61.4% (n = 463) reported that patients should self-monitor. Respondents favored monitoring physical function, pain, and analgesia use over monitoring measures of BMI, self management plans, and exercise advice.<p></p> <b>Conclusions</b> The majority of respondents felt that monitoring OA was important, but this was not reflected in their reported current practice. Much of what they favored for monitoring was in line with published guidance, suggesting provision of suboptimal care does not result from lack of knowledge and interventions to improve OA care must address barriers to GPs engaging in optimal care provision