Fundamental Effects of Clustering on the Euclidean Embedding of Internet Hosts ⋆

Abstract. The network distance estimation schemes based on Euclidean embedding have been shown to provide reasonably good overall accuracy. While some recent studies have revealed that triangle inequality violations (TIVs) inherent in network distances among Internet hosts fundamentally limit their accuracy, these Euclidean embedding methods are nonetheless appealing and useful for many applications due to their simplicity and scalability. In this paper, we investigate why the Euclidean embedding shows reasonable accuracy despite the prevalence of TIVs, focusing in particular on the effect of clustering among Internet hosts. Through mathematical analysis and experiments, we demonstrate that clustering of Internet hosts reduces the effective dimension of the distances, hence low-dimension Euclidean embedding suffices to produce reasonable accuracy. Our findings also provide us with good guidelines as to how to select landmarks to improve the accuracy, and explains why random selection of a large number of landmarks improves the accuracy.

Fundamental effects of clustering on the euclidean embedding of Internet hosts

Abstract. The network distance estimation schemes based on Euclidean embedding have been shown to provide reasonably good overall accuracy. While some recent studies have revealed that triangle inequality violations (TIVs) inherent in network distances among Internet hosts fundamentally limit their accuracy, these Euclidean embedding methods are nonetheless appealing and useful for many applications due to their simplicity and scalability. In this paper, we investigate why the Euclidean embedding shows reasonable accuracy despite the prevalence of TIVs, focusing in particular on the effect of clustering among Internet hosts. Through mathematical analysis and experiments, we demonstrate that clustering of Internet hosts reduces the effective dimension of the distances, hence low-dimension Euclidean embedding suffices to produce reasonable accuracy. Our findings also provide us with good guidelines as to how to select landmarks to improve the accuracy, and explains why random selection of a large number of landmarks improves the accuracy