63,545 research outputs found

    BFF: A tool for eliciting tie strength and user communities in social networking services

    Get PDF
    The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10796-013-9453-6The use of social networking services (SNSs) such as Facebook has explosively grown in the last few years. Users see these SNSs as useful tools to find friends and interact with them. Moreover, SNSs allow their users to share photos, videos, and express their thoughts and feelings. However, users are usually concerned about their privacy when using SNSs. This is because the public image of a subject can be affected by photos or comments posted on a social network. In this way, recent studies demonstrate that users are demanding better mechanisms to protect their privacy. An appropriate approximation to solve this could be a privacy assistant software agent that automatically suggests a privacy policy for any item to be shared on a SNS. The first step for developing such an agent is to be able to elicit meaningful information that can lead to accurate privacy policy predictions. In particular, the information needed is user communities and the strength of users' relationships, which, as suggested by recent empirical evidence, are the most important factors that drive disclosure in SNSs. Given the number of friends that users can have and the number of communities they may be involved on, it is infeasible that users are able to provide this information without the whole eliciting process becoming confusing and time consuming. In this work, we present a tool called Best Friend Forever (BFF) that automatically classifies the friends of a user in communities and assigns a value to the strength of the relationship ties to each one. We also present an experimental evaluation involving 38 subjects that showed that BFF can significantly alleviate the burden of eliciting communities and relationship strength.This work has been partially supported by CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022, and TIN 2008-04446 and PROMETEO II/2013/019 projects. This article has been developed as a result of a mobility stay funded by the Erasmus Mundus Programme of the European Comission under the Transatlantic Partnership for Excellence in Engineering - TEE Project.López Fogués, R.; Such Aparicio, JM.; Espinosa Minguet, AR.; García-Fornes, A. (2014). BFF: A tool for eliciting tie strength and user communities in social networking services. Information Systems Frontiers. 16:225-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9453-6S22523716Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008.Boyd, D., & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday, 15(8).Burt, R. (1995). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Pr.Culotta, A., Bekkerman, R., McCallum, A. (2004). Extracting social networks and contact information from email and the web.Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook friends: social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.Fang, L., & LeFevre, K. (2010). Privacy wizards for social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 351–360). ACM.Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3-5), 75–174.Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 211–220). ACM.Girvan, M., & Newman, M. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99(12), 7821.Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1360–1380.Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on privacy in the electronic society (pp. 71–80). ACM.Johnson, M., Egelman, S., Bellovin, S. (2012). Facebook and privacy: it’s complicated. In Proceedings of the eighth symposium on usable privacy and security (p. 9). ACM .Kahanda, I., & Neville, J. (2009). Using transactional information to predict link strength in online social networks. In Proceedings of the third international conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM).Lancichinetti, A., & Fortunato, S. (2009). Community detection algorithms: a comparative analysis. Physical Review E, 80, 056–117.Lancichinetti, A., Fortunato, S., Kertsz, J. (2009). Detecting the overlapping and hierarchical community structure in complex networks. New Journal of Physics, 11(3), 033–015.Lin, N., Ensel, W., Vaughn, J. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 393–405.Lipford, H., Besmer, A., Watson, J. (2008). Understanding privacy settings in facebook with an audience view. In Proceedings of the 1st conference on usability, psychology, and security (pp. 1–8). Berkeley: USENIX Association.Liu, G., Wang, Y., Orgun, M. (2010). Optimal social trust path selection in complex social networks. In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 139–1398). AAAI.Matsuo, Y., Mori, J., Hamasaki, M., Nishimura, T., Takeda, H., Hasida, K., Ishizuka, M. (2007). Polyphonet: an advanced social network extraction system from the web. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(4), 262–278. World Wide Web Conference 2006 Semantic Web Track.Murukannaiah, P., & Singh, M. (2011). Platys social: relating shared places and private social circles. Internet Computing IEEE, 99, 1–1.Quercia, D., Lambiotte, R., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Crowcroft, J. (2012). The personality of popular facebook users. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW’12).Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(4), 1118–1123.Sharma, G., Qiang, Y., Wenjun, S., Qi, L. (2013). Communication in virtual world: Second life and business opportunities. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(4), 677–694.Shen, K., Song, L., Yang, X., Zhang, W. (2010). A hierarchical diffusion algorithm for community detection in social networks. In 2010 international conference on cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery (CyberC) (pp. 276–283). IEEE.Sierra, C., & Debenham, J. (2007). The LOGIC negotiation model. In AAMAS ’07: proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1–8). ACM.Staddon, J., Huffaker, D., Brown, L., Sedley, A. (2012). Are privacy concerns a turn-off?: engagement and privacy in social networks. In Proceedings of the eighth symposium on usable privacy and security (p. 10). ACM.Strater, K., & Lipford, H.R. (2008). Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: culture, creativity, interaction, BCS-HCI ’08 (Vol. 1, pp. 111–119). Swinton: British Computer Society.Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 558–588.Wiese, J., Kelley, P., Cranor, L., Dabbish, L., Hong, J., Zimmerman, J. (2011). Are you close with me? are you nearby? investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (pp. 197–206). ACM.Xiang, R., Neville, J., Rogati, M. (2010). Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 981–990). ACM

    On the discovery of social roles in large scale social systems

    Get PDF
    The social role of a participant in a social system is a label conceptualizing the circumstances under which she interacts within it. They may be used as a theoretical tool that explains why and how users participate in an online social system. Social role analysis also serves practical purposes, such as reducing the structure of complex systems to rela- tionships among roles rather than alters, and enabling a comparison of social systems that emerge in similar contexts. This article presents a data-driven approach for the discovery of social roles in large scale social systems. Motivated by an analysis of the present art, the method discovers roles by the conditional triad censuses of user ego-networks, which is a promising tool because they capture the degree to which basic social forces push upon a user to interact with others. Clusters of censuses, inferred from samples of large scale network carefully chosen to preserve local structural prop- erties, define the social roles. The promise of the method is demonstrated by discussing and discovering the roles that emerge in both Facebook and Wikipedia. The article con- cludes with a discussion of the challenges and future opportunities in the discovery of social roles in large social systems

    Social networks : the future for health care delivery

    Get PDF
    With the rapid growth of online social networking for health, health care systems are experiencing an inescapable increase in complexity. This is not necessarily a drawback; self-organising, adaptive networks could become central to future health care delivery. This paper considers whether social networks composed of patients and their social circles can compete with, or complement, professional networks in assembling health-related information of value for improving health and health care. Using the framework of analysis of a two-sided network – patients and providers – with multiple platforms for interaction, we argue that the structure and dynamics of such a network has implications for future health care. Patients are using social networking to access and contribute health information. Among those living with chronic illness and disability and engaging with social networks, there is considerable expertise in assessing, combining and exploiting information. Social networking is providing a new landscape for patients to assemble health information, relatively free from the constraints of traditional health care. However, health information from social networks currently complements traditional sources rather than substituting for them. Networking among health care provider organisations is enabling greater exploitation of health information for health care planning. The platforms of interaction are also changing. Patient-doctor encounters are now more permeable to influence from social networks and professional networks. Diffuse and temporary platforms of interaction enable discourse between patients and professionals, and include platforms controlled by patients. We argue that social networking has the potential to change patterns of health inequalities and access to health care, alter the stability of health care provision and lead to a reformulation of the role of health professionals. Further research is needed to understand how network structure combined with its dynamics will affect the flow of information and potentially the allocation of health care resources
    corecore