2 research outputs found

    Formalizing Timing Diagram Requirements in Discrete Duration Calulus

    Full text link
    Several temporal logics have been proposed to formalise timing diagram requirements over hardware and embedded controllers. These include LTL, discrete time MTL and the recent industry standard PSL. However, succintness and visual structure of a timing diagram are not adequately captured by their formulae. Interval temporal logic QDDC is a highly succint and visual notation for specifying patterns of behaviours. In this paper, we propose a practically useful notation called SeCeCntnl which enhances negation free fragment of QDDC with features of nominals and limited liveness. We show that timing diagrams can be naturally (compositionally) and succintly formalized in SeCeCntnl as compared with PSL and MTL. We give a linear time translation from timing diagrams to SeCeCntnl. As our second main result, we propose a linear time translation of SeCeCntnl into QDDC. This allows QDDC tools such as DCVALID and DCSynth to be used for checking consistency of timing diagram requirements as well as for automatic synthesis of property monitors and controllers. We give examples of a minepump controller and a bus arbiter to illustrate our tools. Giving a theoretical analysis, we show that for the proposed SeCeCntnl, the satisfiability and model checking have elementary complexity as compared to the non-elementary complexity for the full logic QDDC

    DCSYNTH: Guided Reactive Synthesis with Soft Requirements

    Full text link
    In reactive controller synthesis, a number of implementations (controllers) are possible for a given specification because of the incomplete nature of specification. To choose the most desirable one from the various options, we need to specify additional properties which can guide the synthesis. In this paper, We propose a technique for guided controller synthesis from regular requirements which are specified using an interval temporal logic QDDC. We find that QDDC is well suited for guided synthesis due to its superiority in dealing with both qualitative and quantitative specifications. Our framework allows specification consisting of both hard and soft requirements as QDDC formulas. We have also developed a method and a tool DCSynth, which computes a controller that invariantly satisfies the hard requirement and it optimally meets the soft requirement. The proposed technique is also useful in dealing with conflicting i.e., unrealizable requirements, by making some of them as soft requirements. Case studies are carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the soft requirement guided synthesis in obtaining high-quality controllers. The quality of the synthesized controllers is compared using metrics measuring both the guaranteed and the expected case behaviour of the controlled system. Tool DCSynth facilitates such comparison
    corecore