A fast semi-direct least squares algorithm for hierarchically block separable matrices

We present a fast algorithm for linear least squares problems governed by hierarchically block separable (HBS) matrices. Such matrices are generally dense but data-sparse and can describe many important operators including those derived from asymptotically smooth radial kernels that are not too oscillatory. The algorithm is based on a recursive skeletonization procedure that exposes this sparsity and solves the dense least squares problem as a larger, equality-constrained, sparse one. It relies on a sparse QR factorization coupled with iterative weighted least squares methods. In essence, our scheme consists of a direct component, comprised of matrix compression and factorization, followed by an iterative component to enforce certain equality constraints. At most two iterations are typically required for problems that are not too ill-conditioned. For an $M \times N$ HBS matrix with $M \geq N$ having bounded off-diagonal block rank, the algorithm has optimal $\mathcal{O} (M + N)$ complexity. If the rank increases with the spatial dimension as is common for operators that are singular at the origin, then this becomes $\mathcal{O} (M + N)$ in 1D, $\mathcal{O} (M + N^{3/2})$ in 2D, and $\mathcal{O} (M + N^{2})$ in 3D. We illustrate the performance of the method on both over- and underdetermined systems in a variety of settings, with an emphasis on radial basis function approximation and efficient updating and downdating.Comment: 24 pages, 8 figures, 6 tables; to appear in SIAM J. Matrix Anal. App

Algorithmic and Statistical Perspectives on Large-Scale Data Analysis

In recent years, ideas from statistics and scientific computing have begun to interact in increasingly sophisticated and fruitful ways with ideas from computer science and the theory of algorithms to aid in the development of improved worst-case algorithms that are useful for large-scale scientific and Internet data analysis problems. In this chapter, I will describe two recent examples---one having to do with selecting good columns or features from a (DNA Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) data matrix, and the other having to do with selecting good clusters or communities from a data graph (representing a social or information network)---that drew on ideas from both areas and that may serve as a model for exploiting complementary algorithmic and statistical perspectives in order to solve applied large-scale data analysis problems.Comment: 33 pages. To appear in Uwe Naumann and Olaf Schenk, editors, "Combinatorial Scientific Computing," Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, 201