Fast Generation of Random Spanning Trees and the Effective Resistance Metric

We present a new algorithm for generating a uniformly random spanning tree in an undirected graph. Our algorithm samples such a tree in expected $\tilde{O}(m^{4/3})$ time. This improves over the best previously known bound of $\min(\tilde{O}(m\sqrt{n}),O(n^{\omega}))$ -- that follows from the work of Kelner and M\k{a}dry [FOCS'09] and of Colbourn et al. [J. Algorithms'96] -- whenever the input graph is sufficiently sparse. At a high level, our result stems from carefully exploiting the interplay of random spanning trees, random walks, and the notion of effective resistance, as well as from devising a way to algorithmically relate these concepts to the combinatorial structure of the graph. This involves, in particular, establishing a new connection between the effective resistance metric and the cut structure of the underlying graph

Sampling Random Spanning Trees Faster than Matrix Multiplication

We present an algorithm that, with high probability, generates a random spanning tree from an edge-weighted undirected graph in $\tilde{O}(n^{4/3}m^{1/2}+n^{2})$ time (The $\tilde{O}(\cdot)$ notation hides $\operatorname{polylog}(n)$ factors). The tree is sampled from a distribution where the probability of each tree is proportional to the product of its edge weights. This improves upon the previous best algorithm due to Colbourn et al. that runs in matrix multiplication time, $O(n^\omega)$. For the special case of unweighted graphs, this improves upon the best previously known running time of $\tilde{O}(\min\{n^{\omega},m\sqrt{n},m^{4/3}\})$ for $m \gg n^{5/3}$ (Colbourn et al. '96, Kelner-Madry '09, Madry et al. '15). The effective resistance metric is essential to our algorithm, as in the work of Madry et al., but we eschew determinant-based and random walk-based techniques used by previous algorithms. Instead, our algorithm is based on Gaussian elimination, and the fact that effective resistance is preserved in the graph resulting from eliminating a subset of vertices (called a Schur complement). As part of our algorithm, we show how to compute $\epsilon$-approximate effective resistances for a set $S$ of vertex pairs via approximate Schur complements in $\tilde{O}(m+(n + |S|)\epsilon^{-2})$ time, without using the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma which requires $\tilde{O}( \min\{(m + |S|)\epsilon^{-2}, m+n\epsilon^{-4} +|S|\epsilon^{-2}\})$ time. We combine this approximation procedure with an error correction procedure for handing edges where our estimate isn't sufficiently accurate