2 research outputs found

    False Positive Reduction in Lung Computed Tomography Images using Convolutional Neural Networks

    Full text link
    Recent studies have shown that lung cancer screening using annual low-dose computed tomography (CT) reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% compared to traditional chest radiography. Therefore, CT lung screening has started to be used widely all across the world. However, analyzing these images is a serious burden for radiologists. In this study, we propose a novel and simple framework that analyzes CT lung screenings using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and reduces false positives. Our framework shows that even non-complex architectures are very powerful to classify 3D nodule data when compared to traditional methods. We also use different fusions in order to show their power and effect on the overall score. 3D CNNs are preferred over 2D CNNs because data are in 3D, and 2D convolutional operations may result in information loss. Mini-batch is used in order to overcome class-imbalance. Proposed framework has been validated according to the LUNA16 challenge evaluation and got score of 0.786, which is the average sensitivity values at seven predefined false positive (FP) points.Comment: 4 page

    Π˜ΡΠΊΡƒΡΡΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ Π² скринингС Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ: ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° диагностичСской точности Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΌΠ° для Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡŒΡŽΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ„ΠΈΠΉ

    Get PDF
    The diagnostic accuracy of the artificial intelligence algorithm aimed to detect lesions on low-dose computer tomograms has been independently assessed. The dataset formed as part of the lung cancer screening program in Moscow was used. The following indicators have been defined: sensitivity – 0.817%, specificity – 0.925%, accuracy – 0.860%, area under the characteristic curve – 0.930. High accuracy rates demonstrated through the independent assessment indicate a good reproducibility of the results by artificial intelligence using independent data about the population of MoscowΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° нСзависимая ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° диагностичСской точности Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΌΠ° искусствСнного ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π° для выявлСния ΠΎΡ‡Π°Π³ΠΎΠ² пораТСния Π½Π° Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡŒΡŽΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΌΠ°Ρ…. Использован датасСт, сформированный Π² Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ… ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΌΡ‹ скрининга Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² Π³. МосквС. ΠžΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ: Ρ‡ΡƒΠ²ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ – 0,817%, ΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ†ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ – 0,925%, Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ – 0,860%, ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‰Π°Π΄ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ характСристичСской ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΉ – 0,930. ВысокиС ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ точности, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ нСзависимом тСстировании, ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ ΠΎ Ρ…ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡˆΠ΅ΠΉ воспроизводимости Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ искусствСнного ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π° Π½Π° нСзависимых Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…, относящихся ΠΊ популяции Π³. ΠœΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Ρ‹
    corecore