1,432 research outputs found

    Extremal problems on shadows and hypercuts in simplicial complexes

    Full text link
    Let FF be an nn-vertex forest. We say that an edge eβˆ‰Fe\notin F is in the shadow of FF if Fβˆͺ{e}F\cup\{e\} contains a cycle. It is easy to see that if FF is "almost a tree", that is, it has nβˆ’2n-2 edges, then at least ⌊n24βŒ‹\lfloor\frac{n^2}{4}\rfloor edges are in its shadow and this is tight. Equivalently, the largest number of edges an nn-vertex cut can have is ⌊n24βŒ‹\lfloor\frac{n^2}{4}\rfloor. These notions have natural analogs in higher dd-dimensional simplicial complexes, graphs being the case d=1d=1. The results in dimension d>1d>1 turn out to be remarkably different from the case in graphs. In particular the corresponding bounds depend on the underlying field of coefficients. We find the (tight) analogous theorems for d=2d=2. We construct 22-dimensional "Q\mathbb Q-almost-hypertrees" (defined below) with an empty shadow. We also show that the shadow of an "F2\mathbb F_2-almost-hypertree" cannot be empty, and its least possible density is Θ(1n)\Theta(\frac{1}{n}). In addition we construct very large hyperforests with a shadow that is empty over every field. For dβ‰₯4d\ge 4 even, we construct dd-dimensional F2\mathbb{F} _2-almost-hypertree whose shadow has density on(1)o_n(1). Finally, we mention several intriguing open questions

    Fullerenes with the maximum Clar number

    Full text link
    The Clar number of a fullerene is the maximum number of independent resonant hexagons in the fullerene. It is known that the Clar number of a fullerene with n vertices is bounded above by [n/6]-2. We find that there are no fullerenes whose order n is congruent to 2 modulo 6 attaining this bound. In other words, the Clar number for a fullerene whose order n is congruent to 2 modulo 6 is bounded above by [n/6]-3. Moreover, we show that two experimentally produced fullerenes C80:1 (D5d) and C80:2 (D2) attain this bound. Finally, we present a graph-theoretical characterization for fullerenes, whose order n is congruent to 2 (respectively, 4) modulo 6, achieving the maximum Clar number [n/6]-3 (respectively, [n/6]-2)

    Phase transitions of extremal cuts for the configuration model

    Get PDF
    The kk-section width and the Max-Cut for the configuration model are shown to exhibit phase transitions according to the values of certain parameters of the asymptotic degree distribution. These transitions mirror those observed on Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graphs, established by Luczak and McDiarmid (2001), and Coppersmith et al. (2004), respectively

    Optimal Bounds for the kk-cut Problem

    Full text link
    In the kk-cut problem, we want to find the smallest set of edges whose deletion breaks a given (multi)graph into kk connected components. Algorithms of Karger & Stein and Thorup showed how to find such a minimum kk-cut in time approximately O(n2k)O(n^{2k}). The best lower bounds come from conjectures about the solvability of the kk-clique problem, and show that solving kk-cut is likely to require time Ξ©(nk)\Omega(n^k). Recent results of Gupta, Lee & Li have given special-purpose algorithms that solve the problem in time n1.98k+O(1)n^{1.98k + O(1)}, and ones that have better performance for special classes of graphs (e.g., for small integer weights). In this work, we resolve the problem for general graphs, by showing that the Contraction Algorithm of Karger outputs any fixed kk-cut of weight Ξ±Ξ»k\alpha \lambda_k with probability Ξ©k(nβˆ’Ξ±k)\Omega_k(n^{-\alpha k}), where Ξ»k\lambda_k denotes the minimum kk-cut size. This also gives an extremal bound of Ok(nk)O_k(n^k) on the number of minimum kk-cuts and an algorithm to compute a minimum kk-cut in similar runtime. Both are tight up to lower-order factors, with the algorithmic lower bound assuming hardness of max-weight kk-clique. The first main ingredient in our result is a fine-grained analysis of how the graph shrinks -- and how the average degree evolves -- in the Karger process. The second ingredient is an extremal bound on the number of cuts of size less than 2Ξ»k/k2 \lambda_k/k, using the Sunflower lemma.Comment: Final version of arXiv:1911.09165 with new and more general proof
    • …
    corecore