46 research outputs found

    Exploring hypergraphs with martingales

    Full text link
    Recently, we adapted exploration and martingale arguments of Nachmias and Peres, in turn based on ideas of Martin-L\"of, Karp and Aldous, to prove asymptotic normality of the number L1L_1 of vertices in the largest component CC of the random rr-uniform hypergraph throughout the supercritical regime. In this paper we take these arguments further to prove two new results: strong tail bounds on the distribution of L1L_1, and joint asymptotic normality of L1L_1 and the number M1M_1 of edges of CC. These results are used in a separate paper "Counting connected hypergraphs via the probabilistic method" to enumerate sparsely connected hypergraphs asymptotically.Comment: 32 pages; significantly expanded presentation. To appear in Random Structures and Algorithm

    Counting connected hypergraphs via the probabilistic method

    Full text link
    In 1990 Bender, Canfield and McKay gave an asymptotic formula for the number of connected graphs on [n][n] with mm edges, whenever nn and the nullity mn+1m-n+1 tend to infinity. Asymptotic formulae for the number of connected rr-uniform hypergraphs on [n][n] with mm edges and so nullity t=(r1)mn+1t=(r-1)m-n+1 were proved by Karo\'nski and \L uczak for the case t=o(logn/loglogn)t=o(\log n/\log\log n), and Behrisch, Coja-Oghlan and Kang for t=Θ(n)t=\Theta(n). Here we prove such a formula for any r3r\ge 3 fixed, and any t=t(n)t=t(n) satisfying t=o(n)t=o(n) and tt\to\infty as nn\to\infty. This leaves open only the (much simpler) case t/nt/n\to\infty, which we will consider in future work. ( arXiv:1511.04739 ) Our approach is probabilistic. Let Hn,prH^r_{n,p} denote the random rr-uniform hypergraph on [n][n] in which each edge is present independently with probability pp. Let L1L_1 and M1M_1 be the numbers of vertices and edges in the largest component of Hn,prH^r_{n,p}. We prove a local limit theorem giving an asymptotic formula for the probability that L1L_1 and M1M_1 take any given pair of values within the `typical' range, for any p=p(n)p=p(n) in the supercritical regime, i.e., when p=p(n)=(1+ϵ(n))(r2)!nr+1p=p(n)=(1+\epsilon(n))(r-2)!n^{-r+1} where ϵ3n\epsilon^3n\to\infty and ϵ0\epsilon\to 0; our enumerative result then follows easily. Taking as a starting point the recent joint central limit theorem for L1L_1 and M1M_1, we use smoothing techniques to show that `nearby' pairs of values arise with about the same probability, leading to the local limit theorem. Behrisch et al used similar ideas in a very different way, that does not seem to work in our setting. Independently, Sato and Wormald have recently proved the special case r=3r=3, with an additional restriction on tt. They use complementary, more enumerative methods, which seem to have a more limited scope, but to give additional information when they do work.Comment: Expanded; asymptotics clarified - no significant mathematical changes. 67 pages (including appendix
    corecore