7 research outputs found
Experimental Test of the “Special State” Theory of Quantum Measurement
An experimental test of the “special state” theory of quantum measurement is proposed. It should be feasible with present-day laboratory equipment and involves a slightly elaborated Stern–Gerlach setup. The “special state” theory is conservative with respect to quantum mechanics, but radical with respect to statistical mechanics, in particular regarding the arrow of time. In this article background material is given on both quantum measurement and statistical mechanics aspects. For example, it is shown that future boundary conditions would not contradict experience, indicating that the fundamental equal-a-priori-probability assumption at the foundations of statistical mechanics is far too strong (since future conditioning reduces the class of allowed states). The test is based on a feature of this theory that was found necessary in order to recover standard (Born) probabilities in quantum measurements. Specifically, certain systems should have “noise” whose amplitude follows the long-tailed Cauchy distribution. This distribution is marked by the occasional occurrence of extremely large signals as well as a non-self-averaging property. The proposed test is a variant of the Stern–Gerlach experiment in which protocols are devised, some of which will require the presence of this noise, some of which will not. The likely observational schemes would involve the distinction between detection and non-detection of that “noise”. The signal to be detected (or not) would be either single photons or electric fields (and related excitations) in the neighborhood of the ends of the magnets
A New Class of Retrocausal Models
Globally-constrained classical fields provide a unexplored framework for
modeling quantum phenomena, including apparent particle-like behavior. By
allowing controllable constraints on unknown past fields, these models are
retrocausal but not retro-signaling, respecting the conventional block universe
viewpoint of classical spacetime. Several example models are developed that
resolve the most essential problems with using classical electromagnetic fields
to explain single-photon phenomena. These models share some similarities with
Stochastic Electrodynamics, but without the infinite background energy problem,
and with a clear path to explaining entanglement phenomena. Intriguingly, the
average intermediate field intensities share a surprising connection with
quantum "weak values", even in the single-photon limit. This new class of
models is hoped to guide further research into spacetime-based accounts of weak
values, entanglement, and other quantum phenomena.Comment: 17 pages, 3 figures. Accepted for publication in Entrop
Bell's Theorem and Locally-Mediated Reformulations of Quantum Mechanics
Bell's Theorem rules out many potential reformulations of quantum mechanics,
but within a generalized framework, it does not exclude all "locally-mediated"
models. Such models describe the correlations between entangled particles as
mediated by intermediate parameters which track the particle world-lines and
respect Lorentz covariance. These locally-mediated models require the
relaxation of an arrow-of-time assumption which is typically taken for granted.
Specifically, some of the mediating parameters in these models must
functionally depend on measurement settings in their future, i.e., on input
parameters associated with later times. This option (often called
"retrocausal") has been repeatedly pointed out in the literature, but the
exploration of explicit locally-mediated toy-models capable of describing
specific entanglement phenomena has begun only in the past decade. A brief
survey of such models is included here. These models provide a continuous and
consistent description of events associated with spacetime locations, with
aspects that are solved "all-at-once" rather than unfolding from the past to
the future. The tension between quantum mechanics and relativity which is
usually associated with Bell's Theorem does not occur here. Unlike conventional
quantum models, the number of parameters needed to specify the state of a
system does not grow exponentially with the number of entangled particles. The
promise of generalizing such models to account for all quantum phenomena is
identified as a grand challenge.Comment: 61 pages, 2 figures; accepted for publication by Rev. Mod. Phy
Towards a Realistic Parsing of the Feynman Path Integral
The Feynman path integral does not allow a one real path interpretation, because the quantum amplitudes contribute to probabilities in a non-separable manner. The opposite extreme, all paths happen, is not a useful or informative account. In this paper it is shown that an intermediate parsing of the path integral, into realistic non-interfering possibilities, is always available. Each realistic possibility formally corresponds to numerous particle paths, but is arguably best interpreted as a spacetime-valued field. Notably, one actual field history can always be said to occur, although it will generally not have an extremized action. The most obvious concerns with this approach are addressed, indicating necessary follow-up research. But without obvious showstoppers, it seems plausible that the path integral might be reinterpreted to explain quantum phenomena in terms of Lorentz covariant field histories.Quanta 2016; 5: 1–11
The negative way to sentience
While the materialist paradigm is credited for the incredible success of science in describing the world, to some scientists and philosophers there seems to be something about subjective experience that is left out, in an apparently irreconcilable way. I show that indeed a scientific description of reality faces a serious limitation, which explains this position. On the other hand, to remain in the realm of science, I explore the problem of sentient experience in an indirect way, through its possible physical correlates. This can only be done in a negative way, which consists in the falsification of various hypotheses and the derivation of no-go results. The general approach I use here is based on simple mathematical proofs about dynamical systems, which I then particularize to several types of physical theories and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Despite choosing this scientifically-prudent approach, it turns out that various possibilities to consider sentience as fundamental make empirical predictions, ranging from some that can only be verified on a subjective basis to some about the physical correlates of sentience, which are independently falsifiable by objective means