4,648 research outputs found
Collaborative Verification-Driven Engineering of Hybrid Systems
Hybrid systems with both discrete and continuous dynamics are an important
model for real-world cyber-physical systems. The key challenge is to ensure
their correct functioning w.r.t. safety requirements. Promising techniques to
ensure safety seem to be model-driven engineering to develop hybrid systems in
a well-defined and traceable manner, and formal verification to prove their
correctness. Their combination forms the vision of verification-driven
engineering. Often, hybrid systems are rather complex in that they require
expertise from many domains (e.g., robotics, control systems, computer science,
software engineering, and mechanical engineering). Moreover, despite the
remarkable progress in automating formal verification of hybrid systems, the
construction of proofs of complex systems often requires nontrivial human
guidance, since hybrid systems verification tools solve undecidable problems.
It is, thus, not uncommon for development and verification teams to consist of
many players with diverse expertise. This paper introduces a
verification-driven engineering toolset that extends our previous work on
hybrid and arithmetic verification with tools for (i) graphical (UML) and
textual modeling of hybrid systems, (ii) exchanging and comparing models and
proofs, and (iii) managing verification tasks. This toolset makes it easier to
tackle large-scale verification tasks
A model-driven approach to broaden the detection of software performance antipatterns at runtime
Performance antipatterns document bad design patterns that have negative
influence on system performance. In our previous work we formalized such
antipatterns as logical predicates that predicate on four views: (i) the static
view that captures the software elements (e.g. classes, components) and the
static relationships among them; (ii) the dynamic view that represents the
interaction (e.g. messages) that occurs between the software entities elements
to provide the system functionalities; (iii) the deployment view that describes
the hardware elements (e.g. processing nodes) and the mapping of the software
entities onto the hardware platform; (iv) the performance view that collects
specific performance indices. In this paper we present a lightweight
infrastructure that is able to detect performance antipatterns at runtime
through monitoring. The proposed approach precalculates such predicates and
identifies antipatterns whose static, dynamic and deployment sub-predicates are
validated by the current system configuration and brings at runtime the
verification of performance sub-predicates. The proposed infrastructure
leverages model-driven techniques to generate probes for monitoring the
performance sub-predicates and detecting antipatterns at runtime.Comment: In Proceedings FESCA 2014, arXiv:1404.043
Challenges and Directions in Formalizing the Semantics of Modeling Languages
Developing software from models is a growing practice and there exist many model-based tools (e.g., editors, interpreters, debuggers, and simulators) for supporting model-driven engineering. Even though these tools facilitate the automation of software engineering tasks and activities, such tools are typically engineered manually. However, many of these tools have a common semantic foundation centered around an underlying modeling language, which would make it possible to automate their development if the modeling language specification were formalized. Even though there has been much work in formalizing programming languages, with many successful tools constructed using such formalisms, there has been little work in formalizing modeling languages for the purpose of automation. This paper discusses possible semantics-based approaches for the formalization of modeling languages and describes how this formalism may be used to automate the construction of modeling tools
- …