Evaluating semantic relations by exploring ontologies on the Semantic Web

We investigate the problem of evaluating the correctness of a semantic relation and propose two methods which explore the increasing number of online ontologies as a source of evidence for predicting correctness. We obtain encouraging results, with some of our measures reaching average precision values of 75%

Pragmatic Ontology Evolution: Reconciling User Requirements and Application Performance

Increasingly, organizations are adopting ontologies to describe their large catalogues of items. These ontologies need to evolve regularly in response to changes in the domain and the emergence of new requirements. An important step of this process is the selection of candidate concepts to include in the new version of the ontology. This operation needs to take into account a variety of factors and in particular reconcile user requirements and application performance. Current ontology evolution methods focus either on ranking concepts according to their relevance or on preserving compatibility with existing applications. However, they do not take in consideration the impact of the ontology evolution process on the performance of computational tasks – e.g., in this work we focus on instance tagging, similarity computation, generation of recommendations, and data clustering. In this paper, we propose the Pragmatic Ontology Evolution (POE) framework, a novel approach for selecting from a group of candidates a set of concepts able to produce a new version of a given ontology that i) is consistent with the a set of user requirements (e.g., max number of concepts in the ontology), ii) is parametrised with respect to a number of dimensions (e.g., topological considerations), and iii) effectively supports relevant computational tasks. Our approach also supports users in navigating the space of possible solutions by showing how certain choices, such as limiting the number of concepts or privileging trendy concepts rather than historical ones, would reflect on the application performance. An evaluation of POE on the real-world scenario of the evolving Springer Nature taxonomy for editorial classification yielded excellent results, demonstrating a significant improvement over alternative approaches

Harvesting online ontologies for ontology evolution

Ontologies need to evolve to keep their domain representation adequate. However, the process of identifying new domain changes, and applying them to the ontology is tedious and time-consuming. Our hypothesis is that online ontologies can provide background knowledge to decrease user efforts during ontology evolution, by integrating new domain concepts through automated relation discovery and relevance assessment techniques, while resulting in ontologies of similar qualities to when the ontology engineers' knowledge is solely used. We propose, implement and evaluate solutions that exploit the conceptual connections and structure of online ontologies to first, automatically suggest new additions to the ontology in the form of concepts derived from domain data, and their corresponding connections to existing elements in the ontology; and second, to automatically evaluate the proposed changes in terms of relevance with respect to the ontology under evolution, by relying on a novel pattern-based technique for relevance assessment. We also present in this thesis various experiments to test the feasibility of each proposed approach separately, in addition to an overall evaluation that validates our hypothesis that user time during evolution is indeed decreased through the use of online ontologies, with comparable results to a fully manual ontology evolution