A Geometric View on Constrained M-Estimators

We study the estimation error of constrained M-estimators, and derive explicit upper bounds on the expected estimation error determined by the Gaussian width of the constraint set. Both of the cases where the true parameter is on the boundary of the constraint set (matched constraint), and where the true parameter is strictly in the constraint set (mismatched constraint) are considered. For both cases, we derive novel universal estimation error bounds for regression in a generalized linear model with the canonical link function. Our error bound for the mismatched constraint case is minimax optimal in terms of its dependence on the sample size, for Gaussian linear regression by the Lasso

Estimation Error of the Constrained Lasso

This paper presents a non-asymptotic upper bound for the estimation error of the constrained lasso, under the high-dimensional ($n \ll p$) setting. In contrast to existing results, the error bound in this paper is sharp, is valid when the parameter to be estimated is not exactly sparse (e.g., when it is weakly sparse), and shows explicitly the effect of over-estimating the $\ell_1$-norm of the parameter to be estimated on the estimation performance. The results of this paper show that the constrained lasso is minimax optimal for estimating a parameter with bounded $\ell_1$-norm, and also for estimating a weakly sparse parameter if its $\ell_1$-norm is accessible

Estimation with Norm Regularization

Analysis of non-asymptotic estimation error and structured statistical recovery based on norm regularized regression, such as Lasso, needs to consider four aspects: the norm, the loss function, the design matrix, and the noise model. This paper presents generalizations of such estimation error analysis on all four aspects compared to the existing literature. We characterize the restricted error set where the estimation error vector lies, establish relations between error sets for the constrained and regularized problems, and present an estimation error bound applicable to any norm. Precise characterizations of the bound is presented for isotropic as well as anisotropic subGaussian design matrices, subGaussian noise models, and convex loss functions, including least squares and generalized linear models. Generic chaining and associated results play an important role in the analysis. A key result from the analysis is that the sample complexity of all such estimators depends on the Gaussian width of a spherical cap corresponding to the restricted error set. Further, once the number of samples $n$ crosses the required sample complexity, the estimation error decreases as $\frac{c}{\sqrt{n}}$, where $c$ depends on the Gaussian width of the unit norm ball.Comment: Fixed technical issues. Generalized some result

Lecture notes on ridge regression

The linear regression model cannot be fitted to high-dimensional data, as the high-dimensionality brings about empirical non-identifiability. Penalized regression overcomes this non-identifiability by augmentation of the loss function by a penalty (i.e. a function of regression coefficients). The ridge penalty is the sum of squared regression coefficients, giving rise to ridge regression. Here many aspect of ridge regression are reviewed e.g. moments, mean squared error, its equivalence to constrained estimation, and its relation to Bayesian regression. Finally, its behaviour and use are illustrated in simulation and on omics data. Subsequently, ridge regression is generalized to allow for a more general penalty. The ridge penalization framework is then translated to logistic regression and its properties are shown to carry over. To contrast ridge penalized estimation, the final chapter introduces its lasso counterpart

Denoising and change point localisation in piecewise-constant high-dimensional regression coefficients

We study the theoretical properties of the fused lasso procedure originally proposed by Tibshirani et al. (2005) in the context of a linear regression model in which the regression coefficient are totally ordered and assumed to be sparse and piecewise constant. Despite its popularity, to the best of our knowledge, estimation error bounds in high-dimensional settings have only been obtained for the simple case in which the design matrix is the identity matrix. We formulate a novel restricted isometry condition on the design matrix that is tailored to the fused lasso estimator and derive estimation bounds for both the constrained version of the fused lasso assuming dense coefficients and for its penalised version. We observe that the estimation error can be dominated by either the lasso or the fused lasso rate, depending on whether the number of non-zero coefficient is larger than the number of piece-wise constant segments. Finally, we devise a post-processing procedure to recover the piecewise-constant pattern of the coefficients. Extensive numerical experiments support our theoretical findings

Quantized Low-Rank Multivariate Regression with Random Dithering

Low-rank multivariate regression (LRMR) is an important statistical learning model that combines highly correlated tasks as a multiresponse regression problem with low-rank priori on the coefficient matrix. In this paper, we study quantized LRMR, a practical setting where the responses and/or the covariates are discretized to finite precision. We focus on the estimation of the underlying coefficient matrix. To make consistent estimator that could achieve arbitrarily small error possible, we employ uniform quantization with random dithering, i.e., we add appropriate random noise to the data before quantization. Specifically, uniform dither and triangular dither are used for responses and covariates, respectively. Based on the quantized data, we propose the constrained Lasso and regularized Lasso estimators, and derive the non-asymptotic error bounds. With the aid of dithering, the estimators achieve minimax optimal rate, while quantization only slightly worsens the multiplicative factor in the error rate. Moreover, we extend our results to a low-rank regression model with matrix responses. We corroborate and demonstrate our theoretical results via simulations on synthetic data or image restoration.Comment: 16 pages (Submitted